alanreyes01
siempre
alanreyes01

Too true. That a pair like the Clintons who operate as scoundrels right out of Mark Twain could be POTUS is direct from Idiocracy.

Fox is more fair and balanced than most big media. If you watched last night, the questions were quite pointed. Even CNN complemented Fox on how fair and direct the debate questions were. Oh, did an actual answer with thinking disrupt your tirade?

If you are lucky, you will also become older and begin to gain experience and wisdom. You can then join all the other people who grew up. As Churchill said: If you are not a Liberal when you are young, you have no heart; if you are not a Conservative when you get older, you have no brain.

It is not trolling to discuss on a discussion forum. It is saddest that these forums have so many under 35’s who don’t understand that discussion means hearing information and opinions that are different than your own. Did I commit a microagression on some of you by presenting thoughts different than your approved

So typical of faux liberals- Woody Allen said he wished Obama could just be made a dictator and you would be happy with a monarchy rather than have actual democracy. And please, you want Bernie and you call others wingnuts, talk about lack of insight. Sad but typical of today’s faux liberals.

Please learn to read before posting. I said he was having reporters from major papers on his show— o’Reilly is not repeating , the reporters are giving reports.

The Dems only candidate is the Clintons...Really, please don’t claim any superiority.

Sadly, I believe you and that you have a legion of under 30s marching to Idiocracy with you.

I didn’t know the Dems were having an event? Oh, right, Dems all walk in lockstep with Clinton leading as she and Bill pick your pocket.Hillary doesn’t allow debates where she could be asked questions.

Those are good, but all have the same viewpoint. I recommend you add in the Telegraph, Japan Times , and Real Clear Politics to get more balance. Neither of us cite the New York Times...sad how low that paper has sunk.

So you want to insult me but you didn’t even keep up with a big story from just a few months ago and cannot even successfully Google to look up a well reported story. Go actually learn by reading the news before you insult those of us who do keep up. I’m not Googling and pasting the story for you.

So, you are saying that in your opinion, Stewart really was a news source? So is he ‘just a comedian ‘ or a real newsman? No, I don’t go to the Comedy Channel for news. I read all types of real news from the New Yorker and the Guardian to Real Clear Politics and the Telegraph..tell me what you read for news.

Your comment expresses all that is bad about current political discussion. You just insult without doing any reading or thinking. You don’t even express what you disagree about. I’m answering you because such egregious behavior needs help. First, do you actually read world news from primary sources? Most world

OReilly just had a pre debate show dedicated to letting national reporters criticize and critique the Repubs. Did you actually watch?

It is as stupid and ignorant to be live in a 7000 year old Earth as it is to believe Stewart didn’t give propaganda or Hillary used a private server for email but never put anything classified in any email.

No, claiming to be a comedian while actually working to get a specific political party advanced is propaganda. Being a editorial writer and openly declaring one’s statements’ intentions is not propaganda.

Satire is great..that is Blazing Saddles, not Stewart visiting his boss Obama at the White House to go over content.

Hillary voted for the Iraq war and had all the same information. Now, in retrospect, the war failed to do what was intended. Just as the Democrat Viet Nam War failed. Both wars had complex beginnings beyond a few words here.

Propaganda is disguising partisan politics as entertainment...So, yes, propaganda means exactly what I intend the word to mean.

Sadly, you have to repeat the obvious in today’s world.