Chrome has an option to close all background processes on exit. It works as advertised.
AkselD
akseld
I switched TO Chrome from FireFox last year because FireFox was such a memory hog. I have a half-dozen or more tabs open at one time and it was using 500MB or more. Chrome right now using 350MB.
I hear they upgraded FF to help with these issues, but I’m going to stick with Chrome until it gives me issues as I’m not…
AND, that facial hair is completely atypical and ahistorical to the time he was in. His reference was the Belle Epoque. That facial and head hair? I don’t know what nonsense that’s supposed to be. People of the 30s would have recognized Suchet’s or Finney’s Poirot as somewhat old-fashioned but, recognizable.
This! Poirot’s fussiness would never allow him to have his tie askew, or - mon dieu! - that attached collar! He was certainly still in stiff, removable (but never ever in public) collars.
Poirot wore bow-ties, not neckties, and even had he worn a necktie, probably wouldn’t have been so sloppy when tying a Half-Windsor. Also, given that the Windsor knot would have been fairly new at the time, Poirot would not have worn it. He was still wearing pince-nez in the 1930s.
No, worries, mademoiselle, the oldest hipster in Brooklyn is on the case.
I recall him being described as “egg shaped” !!
My recently deceased grandmother has risen from her grave and is begging me to tell all of you that THE ONLY LEGITIMATE HERCULE POIROT IS DAVID SUCHET, ALL OTHERS ARE IMPOSTERS AND SHOULD SEE THEMSELVES OUT PROMPTLY.
Looks like they blew the special effects budget on a Snapchat mustache filter.
You have got to be fucking kidding me.
Thank you for this. A woman isn’t lacking in agency just because she’s making decisions you don’t agree with. I might concede that she’s in over her head, but to cast her as someone so blank that she can’t muster up the power to make her own decisions is a disservice to both her, and other women like her. Just because…
Why would you undermine your credibility, and any factual value of your other articles, with this nonsense? Especially when there is real, emerging news with this new administration.
Did you seriously just write a 750+ word article about pizzagate and conspiracy theories that somehow started with a tweet about the CIA criticizing Trump and an errant cut/paste?
Do you guys get...like...bonuses for any article that is somehow critical of and remotely related to the new POTUS?
I mean...i can’t stand…
Yet another example of why “gawker” needs adults in charge.
As both a rational and unhinged person I say: Have the content creators on this family of sites lost their minds? Who comes up with this garbage and worse yet, who approves it?
As humorous as it was, that spray-painted Range Rover was already determined to be a hoax/publicity stunt.
In Soviet Russia truck picks up you!
Alas, his couldn’t fully grip the saw.
Thought this was an article about Trump....still not disappointed.