Sure, he was within his rights to have a gun. However, when his brother and sister say he was unarmed that would discredit them as reliable witnesses.
Sure, he was within his rights to have a gun. However, when his brother and sister say he was unarmed that would discredit them as reliable witnesses.
Yeah! Abolish police! I have complete faith that all citizens will abide by laws!
Nope, not here. Final judgements are made with little information so commenters can get the most “likes”.
Sure it is legal. Yet, it would seem very suspicious if he actually had a gun, but witnesses (family members) were adamant that he was unarmed. If they knew he had a gun, but lied about it then it would affect their credibility in a bad way.