The scoops on the sideblades are just ugly. And frankly the V10 is typical VW, too-many-engines-for-one-chassis. I'd rather have had a diesel option for lots of torque and to be a little bit closer to Audi's racing success...

Markov is right... The mid-engined layout of the Cayman would be better.

I'd rather have seen an R4 really. Too bad that Porsche's interference is holding back Audi.

Because as much as I love my manual, it is no longer the sign of a performance car, as it slows you down.

It isn't a linear comparison but it would be interesting to see how the curves of price worked out.

Unless they can freely call cars crap... it'll suck. I would like to see a formal statement that they will have total editorial independence and then have them rip apart an advertisers car right on the first episode to seal the deal.

I'd definite trade off in this era where Camrys get 0-60 in 7. And I think enthusiasts need to stop whining about gas prices when driving inefficient vehicles, you made a choice so deal with it.

Here is a wishlist, but overall I'll buy one anyway.

Garmin is totally screwed as of this point.

Training Peaks... although Ascent is slowly getting there.

It looks nice, but really looks a bit like the unholy cross between a Lexus SC and an Alfa 8C. Ferrari's have been hit-or-miss, the 360 was better looking than the 430. The 550 Maranello was properly brutal looking if a bit unbalanced, but the 599 and 612 look like messed up Porsches a bit.

The bullshit is that facebook is just another proprietary, unnecessary chat system. Why the hell can't they have just teamed up with Google or used an XMPP/Jabber implementation that was open?

The real reason to use this over GrowlMail is the two way interactivity. You can delete mail from the window.

I don't really understand why Adium doesn't just store IM addresses in the Address Book anyway. That is what it is there for after all.

Volvo V50 and Boxster

There are a lot of reasons:

I am planning to build my own, since it would be cheaper and faster than a QNAP. Just the technicalities are the issue (iSCSI and RAID-Z!)

Why not just send a couple of American cars over to the UK for Clarkson and the gang to whip around their testing grounds?

They keep trying these cut off, angled hatches, and I still don't get the point. Just make a short wagon instead. Or hell, introduce a smaller model below the C with a proper hatch.

How about Leopard Server? That is the stuff I would like to get working on cheaper hardware (although without iSCSI xSAN, it will be a lot less useful)