akamarb--disqus
akamarb
akamarb--disqus

yes but it didnt start off like that , being cartoonishy and far fetched…it dealt with real life questions…mortality…cancer…how far will one go to provide for ones family…good vs bad and many other complicated issues…yet it ended like an episode of CSI…I still to this day dont understand how much praise the last

so we can agree to disagree, sir.

You didn't think that it was a LITTLE bit far-fetched, that the machine gun in the trunk, immediately killed every single person, but of course not the 2 main villains - which then of course had to be killed by the 2 main characters..

Very surprised at a lot of negative comments in regards to the ending episode…The one I am in agreement with , is the fact that there were many fascinating layers mentioned in the earlier episodes - that were eventually left off the map..other then that, the whole series along with the finale - were just beautiful..

Is it just me or did anyone else thought the last scene from No Country for Old men rang very similar ??

Yes, go read Rex Reed then…

perhaps its because he knows more bout film and film history then any other critic working today ?

agreed….he is such an enigma…its beyond explanation

perhaps because u think Tarentino and Nolan are good directors and Roger Ebert was a good critic ?

Armond White is the only critic worth reading ( no joke ) !