“Hunting as conservation is fallacy.”

To conservation. The tags directly support wildlife departments and game wardens and studies. Most all conservation groups, including the Wildlife Conservation Unit at Oxford (the organization that was tracking Cecil) support hunting as a means of conservation.

The original conservationists were all hunters. Still are. Teddy Roosevelt founded the modern conservation movement and he was a prolific hunter.

I can't wait for this to show up in the next season of House of Cards.

Ummm, why are you linking to that 2010 hit piece by Jezebel? The women of the Daily Show refuted it and your author apologized for writing it.

You are really comparing the drugging and raping of HUMAN WOMEN to hunting. That is not ok. At all. Animals are not people. At all. It is NOT OK for you to compare women to animals.

I got greyed too! You are not grey right now. Can you help me get ungrey?

What is in it for me is the continued existence of these species. Hunters have done more to keep them alive then you have. Read the article: the White Rhino was BROUGHT BACK by hunters. The Lions were and are being BROUGHT back by hunters. Not you, not your ragegasm. We have facts and you have barely formed opinions.

Your inability to formulate an actual argument against hunting is sort of proving my point for me.

I love how the car looks so sad and humble, trying to swat the flies with its antenna.

Most of the commenters on this article don't seem to realize that precisely the reason most of these animals are still alive is BECAUSE OF the hunters. Lands that were being used for farming and ranching were converted to hunting lands. White tail were almost extinct in North America until THE HUNTERS, not the…

Human lives are not animal lives.

So us westerns knew who Cecil was before this? Bullshit. He never made news until this.

First, its not torture, and second, THESE ARE NOT PEOPLE.

Again, YOU ARENT THE ONE WHO IS ACTUALLY SAVING THESE ANIMALS. It is “the rich assholes” who are doing it.

Ummmm isn’t this the kind of thing we thought was bad when the NSA was trying it? Collecting data directly to develop profiles of individuals, to track them or label them? Like, “databases full of” my tweets, comments on Jezebel, etc all seem like stuff that was wrong when the NSA was involved. Now that we ostensibly…

If by “maintenance sex” you mean “assault” then sure.

That just makes me more likely to do it.

HOLY FUCKING SHIT REALLY?!

Sex with that dude AND gross food??!?!? Would I???