Yes.

i’m confused - that states there was no proof of any voter fraud. were you being sarcastic and that just flew over my head?

sorry, the what? gonna need sauce for that kind of crap statement.

Are you suggesting we invade Idaho for their strategic potato reserves?

Can I just point out that none of the states closest to North Korea (except Alaska, but nobody’s going to bomb Alaska) voted for Trump? Why can’t he pick a fight with an enemy off the Eastern seaboard so that at least he’s in the kill zone

I don’t think that’s what he was doing either.

The problem is that, by writing a 10 page manifesto and firing it out into the entire company, he was not acting as Devil’s Advocate; he was advancing a power play. There is too much in that article to debate reasonably and concisely, and sending it to masses of people…

It seems safe to assume that his ten page manifesto detailing his belief that women are inherently less fit for tech work gave us some amount of information on which to judge his character. We know as much about him as he told us, which was plenty.

To be fair, no amount of reason, debate or fact has been shown to move climate-change deniers, anti-vaxxers, racists, sexists, bigots, etc. It often makes them dig in their heels and harden their views more than anything.

Maybe he can be the next WH Communications Director?

Correct. The database that Terrell referenced only covers air sorties generated by the Air Forces component of CENTCOM. There is no reason for the Army to provide data since they aren’t part of that component. I don’t think Terrell really understands his topic.

Your conclusions are terrible and leading without any information supporting them. The obvious answer is that the Army wasn’t reporting every incident of an Army helicopter to the Air Force. The Air Force was tracking their airstrikes. The Army probably was never asked or told to participate. So each time an Army…

Completely incorrect, the military is not “misleading the public”

Yeah, that is not what the caption says. The source appears to be this:

you had me at “Leading photo with grossly-inaccurate caption”...

You mean we need a man who is almost always objective except for for a few a bit out of there proposals on mounting missiles on every ship?

I can get behind that.

Yeah, if we don’t tell them we bombed them they will never know.

So we’ve run 6000 black ops aerial missions in the past two years? I don’t think so. And, again, this is just a count, not details of the missions.

So, you want military to be completely transparent with its operations in the middle of a war?
Ever heard of “operations security”?

When it comes to government in general (and military in particular), never assign malice to an act that can be more easily explained by incompetence.