aimattheface
BostonTerror
aimattheface

Literally every study on GMOs - many of which I have read findings and or Abstracts for. You would have a harder time finding someone making a truly credible case that states that GMOs are somehow less healthful, because (to my knowledge) there is not one that exists yet.

You can find credible SOUNDING articles stating

WRT GMOs? Well almost every shred of credible of scientific study on the matter, thats what.

Exactly why you shouldnt be all that close...

I dont know why you would put yourself close to something that would be LIKELY to be struck by lightning. If it is wet out there - when it starts to moved to ground that current will carried across the water. Better to just get to a low lying flat area without any trees or

Ok so I am having trouble finding a "poll" but I am not having trouble finding whole communities and perhaps even Nations that have campaigns against the usage of the word generally or specifically the NFL teams use of the word (links throughout the thread and easily found via Google).

The fact that there is a

Basically your argument is:
I will continue to hold my opinion based on extremely dubious faulty evidence (even in your mind), until I am presented with equally dubious counter examples.

the fact that you should base your opinion on either is fucking idiotic.

Ill have links shortly, becuase for whatever fucking reason

Also there are LOTS OF POLLS (most if not all of which ALSO have questionable methodologies just like every single study you have cited) that state that A MAJORITY OF NAs are in fact offended by the name. So that argument is also a moot point. If you need sources scroll through this chain and you will see many other

Those polls - by your own admission - dont matter since they are so highly problematic they arent even WORTHY OF CONSIDERATION, but it appears your confirmation bias has skewed your perception on what a credible argument or piece of evidence is.

The problem with that is THE ONLY THING WORST THAN NO DATA is REALLY,

Wow you start off somewhat intelligently and then you write a thesis that is more or less fucking idiotic.

You are still jumping to a conclusion on highly questionable evidence. You would be smarter to not CONCLUDE anything until such evidence exists. I refuse to accept such ridiculously evidence as remotely credible -

and are huge money making enterprise with international recognition and not just a fucking high school.

I am speaking to the PROFESSIONAL SPORTS TEAM - that rakes in hundreds of millions and is often broadcast INTERNATIONALLY - whose name is well known in all 50 states.

They can afford to pay the serfs to do it for them.

I blame my underinformed opinions and ideas on other peoples laziness too.

Except that his argument is completely undermined by the fact that he is in effect telling people what to think - based upon some very shaky evidence. I really dont understand how you can not see this as being ridiculously hypocritical.

Reilly is doing more to start the conversation with his BOORISHNESS than his

Dont ask me.

The point is your argument "NAs dont care" is extremely weak at this point - and you cant honestly say that until there is one decent poll. - which was my point.

You literally just proved my point.

that poll is weak for the exact reasons you wrote the damn caveat.

Really? Because EVERYONE that claims what you are claiming doesnt have the actual DATA to back up that assertion. It is almost always anecdotal (often from people who turn out not to be Native American - See Dan Snyder's chief and many of the people interviewed for WaPo etc. etc. - OR their data is completely flawed

Youre right in DEGREE - but redskins is probably much more offensive than cracker.

Using a slightly hyperbolic example still illustrates the point and the principal of the matter. One high school doesnt get to decide that Redskin is reappropriated for all NAs, in the same way that just because "x" doesnt offend you

I am not really sure how being Italian is an excuse - and that seems ridiculously prejudicial (even if it is her ethnicity).

So many people use their own ethnicity as an excuse for their behavior (which seems racist in a way). I have seen more than a few Italians blame their egregious irrational behavior on their deep

Here is a hypothetical that should answer your question.

Imagine if someone named their basketball team the N*ggers. Imagine that the local high schools (mostly African-American) approve of the name. Would that limited consensus be enough to rationalize a name like that given its history and charged nature?

(the answer

Now playing

Please blow up the YouTube comments here - people probably know Robert Hoffman (I have the dubious honor of knowing him personally) - and he helped start this awful trend: