I just started in on the second season of Zoo. Every episode is more bonkers than the last, from the ants that try to blow up a cyclotron to the sloth that causes earthquakes.
I just started in on the second season of Zoo. Every episode is more bonkers than the last, from the ants that try to blow up a cyclotron to the sloth that causes earthquakes.
Every year I need an incredibly clunky show that I can make disbelieving faces at in the privacy of my living room. The Mist is shaping up to be that show. Thank you, The Mist.
Do you want Bob? Because that's how you get Bob.
You could start with the first Davies-era season of the show, with Christopher Eccleston and Billie Piper. Or you could go straight to season five, when Stephen Moffatt took over and Matt Smith took on the lead role. But I'd watch all the Davies-era Who, because the David Tennant run from seasons 2-4 has some of the…
"Come on down to Red Octobers' and order our Dressed Herring and Bliny Plate for only $5.99! It's all there at Red Octobers' - where breakfast eats you!" - Helen Hunt
Well said.
Killjoys is a hell of a lot of fun. If you're one of those people who miss the vague perversity and jokiness of Farscape, it may be your bag. Dark Matter is great if you enjoy pretty people standing around and handing lines of bad dialogue to each other.
That's exactly what I thought of. The scene where the angel places his hand on the suicide's shoulder.
I found the the pilot episode kind of dreadful, with the exception of the opening scene - but maybe it gets better with subsequent episodes? Here's hoping.
But we have absolutely no idea whether this movie is decent or not. The trailers may or not excite you, but Paul Feig and the cast are all funny and talented people. What if this version turns out be the superior film (to be fair, I kind of doubt it). Why not think of this as a tribute to the original and an enjoyable…
Most people are not so much "upset" as "completely apathetic about the whole thing." And how in the world does this erase the history of the originals? The original Ghostbusters movies still exist, no matter what takes place in the 2016 version. They could travel back in time to kick Bill Murray in the junk and we'd…
That was a masterclass in how to destroy a pilot. Slow, clunky and dull. You can practically hear Robert Kirkman saying "Hey guys, have you heard of this thing called demon possession?" On the plus side, Patrick Fugit's child punching skills are fantastic.
Grande's performance was a whole lot better than this review makes her out to be.
Still didn't work for me. But obviously it did for you! This means that, scene for scene, you derived more enjoyment from Jessica Jones than I did.
All true! But it was one of the weakest moments of the series, and it stood out because the show is so great otherwise. Also, it's not really the fact that she got smacked over the head but that Robyn was able to convince the group with a quick speech. It sort of works, but so many shortcuts were taken that it fell…
And it still didn't work.
Angry support group members overcome Jessica! Uh, what?
Definitely the weakest episode so far. I also found the dialogue a bit overwritten, which distracted me even during the one-on-one Jessica/Kilgrave scenes. And this was the first point in the show when things seemed to happen because the plot demanded it. Jessica overpowered and knocked out by members of the Kilgrave…
Laurel just Britta'd that whole thing.
I don't think so. They're very different films. Fessenden may have Cage's hair but not his sensibility. Habit reminds me more of those louche '70s vampire flicks like Daughters of Darkness.