I love Looking, but I know what you mean. Every good show isn't for everybody. I don't think there's a lack of narrative at all, but there might well be a striking difference betwen the narrative of Looking and some other show that you DO like… that represents your own taste in narrative. I was very interested in…

I love Looking, but I completely agree about Vicious.

I am heartened to see some appreciation for Looking. That show started out so quietly, with no grabbers, and people were saying from the get-go that it was dull. I never thought so, and I suspected that their decision not to make it too whimsical or funny or dramatic right at the beginning would pay off later as the…

I don't understand it about Vicious. To me it's just your basic badly-writtten British sitcom getting by on the talents of actors way too good for it, like so many before. I've only seen the pilot, and the main premise was barely enough for a skit; certainly not enough for an American sitcom. And the laugh track was…

So why shouldn't he experiment here as well as there? Anyway, once is an experiment. If you go back, you like it.

Ianto died on Torchwood. I don't think there'd have been much blowback from if there had been another Ianto, but they tamped down Captain Jack's bisexuality.

Why must an established character's sexuality, when there's any wiggle room, always default to exclusively heterosexual? Dangling a "maybe" about his getting out of bed with a man (note: getting out of; God forbid we should see him getting into bed with one), to put the bi-friendly agenda on hold until after the show…

I don't understand why anybody would jump up and down over the absence of Gale Harold and Natasha Henstridge, who are my two favorites.  Moreover, I think the show was ALREADY good.  But I do realize there are people who have always loved the CW's "all teenagers all the time" formula, and want nothing done to change…