Donate a significant portion of your paycheck and bank account before you declare others to do so themselves. Untherwise you’re a hypocrite.
Donate a significant portion of your paycheck and bank account before you declare others to do so themselves. Untherwise you’re a hypocrite.
You are such a thin skinned bitch. Go call another Jewish person a nazi.
The Great Bambino-san
That’s CONCACAF’s problem, not TFC or the MLS.
With all of the stupid rules we place on our MLS teams (outside of the Galaxy and NYRB it feels like) it’s hard to go toe to toe with a league that doesn’t have a cap and whatnot. I think Chivas is the only one that has a self imposed rule about only players with Mexican heritage but I’m not well versed in MX.
When he needs a new kidney in 15-20 years I’ll give him one of mine for a percentage of his total winnings over his career.
I would think MX is better than—but closer to—the MLS but to say that their league competes with European Leagues is crazy. Maybe a League like Denmark’s but even then I’d still go with the Danes in a head to head of both leagues from top to bottom.
Serious question; when do MX clubs “compete” against European clubs. They are closer to MLS’ level than even the weakest top flight European league. Unless he means like Denmark but even then I’d go with the Danes.
I’d take a slide like that 7 days out of the week and twice on Sundays over going into the slide hot and catching the bag with your arm locked and breaking your wrist.
I had all my posts deleted calling them out on trying to make something that wasn’t sexist into sexism.
They should honestly have like the top 10 teams all play each other round robin during non conference. I think it’d boost NCAA WBB ratings and whatnot because there is a pretty big line separating the great teams and the rest. Let them go after each other more than once. Obviously it wouldn’t be a pure round robin…
I’m not the one calling him sexist. I’m the one saying deadspin is baiting it with this article.
Are you implying in this article that Mr Leonard Hamilton is a sexist because of how he responded to Ms Dana Jacobson’s question? That sounds pretty libelous to me if that’s the case unless you have knowledge of previous sexist actions by him. Nice way to skirt around calling him sexist outright though and risk a…
That it’s not sexism and instead a coach mad he blew his chance at a final four and that he doesn’t want to talk about it? Okay.
You can spin whatever I say into whatever you want even if it’s not the truth. Just don’t get too dizzy that you end up puking though.
“I have no real rebuttal so I’ll call you a troll and say you’re making up having a girlfriend to discredit you!”-Natrone Means Bargains
They are the same because both are being used to illicit a headline grabbing response by the reporter. Granted, Ms Jacobson didn’t do so out of malice like the person with the rebounding question did but both that player and that coach just lost the biggest games of their careers. If you fucked up the biggest thing of…
Sure, whatever you want to call it.
Are they not? They are both straightforward questions answered in an assholish way.
No I’m not obtuse and I’m sitting next to my girlfriend who also thinks the headline is rubbish. She’s a journalism major who works in graphic design (better money) but she states from an ethics of journalism standpoint that the article implying it’s because she’s a woman is unethical.