agamagon
agamagon
agamagon

@apierion: Sith had good elements that put it head and shoulders above the other two. It was sort of like a crap sandwich between two slices of awesome (opening battle, ending duel.) Aside from Palpatine, the middle of the film dragged the audience into a stomachlike pit of insufferable dialogue so as to be

@Zom-B: Wookies would definitely have been better. Something looking a bit more like the battle scene in . . dare I say ROTS might've been a bit better.

@jimhefti: Exactly. Come to think of it, Gremlins instead of Ewoks could've worked even better . .?

@all oiled up: I will never say no to "getting into this" with someone named "all oiled up." Yes, late 20's.

@jdmcd: "For the most part, I just wanted to grow up to do what I wanted to do and become whatever that let me become, letting form follow function. And that is ultimately what I did. " Good advice, words to live by, and lucky for me that I stumbled upon your comment. (Now for the love of God don't let you be younger

@tetracycloide: (sigh) . . there can be only one . .? Meh, nevermind.

@tetracycloide: "Been wondering a lot, recently, who Russell’s maker is/was?"

@John_Hazard: "Besides, do we really wish Han Solo died? Well, I'd have to see the full script first." Probably reads something like "I'm a leaf on the wind, I'm a leaf on the wind . . . ; ("

@Nivenus: Can't argue with that. He was a saving grace if there ever could've been one.

As Thursday is the new Friday, it has become exaggeratedly popular in hipster-geek (geekster?) circles to begin the Star Wars hate at ROTJ rather than the Phantom Menace with the charge that the Ewoks "ruined" it. No. They didn't.

Call me old-school, but I communicate via scent excrescence. Makes break-ups way more efficient.

Spoilers for "Breaking Dawn" but worth a read:

"Yeah, he had his *%^ in me against my consent, (as I was being bludgeoned). But he got hurt badly in the process it seemed so . . . traumatized? Me? Nah . . ."