Jesus. You’re really selling that wholly “disney wholesome” thing. Kudos. I had been on the fence, but you really show the whole Disney ethos of comraderie and morality in your many aggressive replies. You’re doing great, message wise!

You’re right, it was “distrust intensely”, upon which I paraphrased. And thanks for my acknowledging my effort, with the “nice try” assuming some sort of gotcha-ish question for you (are you Sarah Palen? dismiss this comment if that is a YES).

That seems extreme, but fair enough. I would suggest, though, that a Disney point of view would suggest your behavior be in line with kindness towards such people, not revulsion, if you were enjoying it as a moral media rather than just entertainment.

You still don’t seem to understand: that gift wasn’t for you, numbnuts.

Out of genuine curiousity: why? I don’t like them myself, although I’m more of the ‘don’t care’ don’t like brand.

It’s always important to remember that how you react to something is individual, and not universal, and so maybe it isn’t all that important in the scheme of things (reworded: it’s not about you).

Are you familiar with the term ‘dog whistle’?

Misunderstanding of academic credentials is a bit of a problem in North America. An MD (medical doctor) is NOT a PhD, and is likely not an expert in vaccine research, as that is research in (basic) biomedicine, not clinical medicine. People who research biochemistry, pathology, development, and diseases generally, are…