Because men or expendable, and women are valuable. One man can impregnate an entire village if there are enough fertile women. It takes one woman 9 months to give birth to a child. Therefore, the more women that are left, the quicker the nation can repopulate.
Aenemia
aenemia
Ummm, I don't know how much special operations knowledge you have, but overseas special forces units are ready to go at a moment's notice because of the volatility of the local area (North Africa, Turkey, etc).
I think the word of someone who actually has special forces experience and knows how units are equipped and how they get deployed has a bit more credibility on the ins and outs of how things went down than a reporter, let alone a female who has never been near a special forces unit in the field.
Sorry, but what special forces team do you know if is only equipped with 9mm weapons? I've never read anything making that claim... it just doesn't hold water.
They're illegal. I refuse to use the PC terms. We're a nation of laws, and they do not respect our laws.
Here's the powers... not listed in there.
You don't need a license to own a gun...
I'm talking about the special forces unit stationed in Italy that could have been there before the 2nd attack. Hell, they could have scrambled an F-16 and buzzed the area. That would have scared enough of the attackers away.
Spying on US citizens isn't a law though. As for right to privacy:
Benghazi could have been mitigated. I'm prior military, and if you read Brandon Webb's (former SEAL) articles on Benghazi, he talks in detail about how support was available, ready to go, and could have been there in time to stop the second attack... It was specifically told to stand down, and orders like that have to…
No, The Constitution just can't be re-interpreted. It is written in very simple English and is easy to understand. The Supreme Court decides whether someone's action is breaking The Constitution or not, they don't decide on new interpretations of it.
I'm sorry, that's not how it works. The government just doesn't get to decide when they're accountable to us and when they're not. That's not the foundation of a free society. Just because the government is doing something doesn't mean they have the authority to.
Because the people aren't holding them accountable. People vote on name recognition and popularity more than they vote on the policies and beliefs of said candidate.
I didn't say the intricate details. People forget that the government works for us. The government reports to us. The government does not control it's people. The people control the government. The government in no way shape or form has the authority to spy on the American people without an individual warrant on a…
No, they can analyze any of the data they're collecting. Nothing is stopping them from analyzing it once they have it. Also, it doesn't matter if you have concerns about it or not. Every person has a right to privacy. The Constitution clearly says the government cannot infringe on that right, whether its for national…
Unless you there was an amendment made to the 4th Amendment that I was unaware of, it doesn't matter what The Supreme Court says. If changes are to be made to The Constitution, there are ways to do it. A supreme court ruling is not listed as one of those ways, so please, try again. The Supreme Court doesn't get free…
There's a way to gather intelligence without violating constitutional rights. It's called the warrant process. Right now they're just doing blanket collection, which is illegal. If a citizen hasn't done something to warrant being spied on, the government has no right to do so. If they focused more on individuals than…
Now playing
That's a lot of space considering they're only collecting who you're calling, where you're calling from, and for how long. They can use that information to learn routines and see if you're doing anything outside of your routine.
For the most part. I understand from a national security standpoint that some data needs to be kept secret, but we should know the majority of what's going on.