Explore our other sites
  • kotaku
  • quartz
  • theroot
  • theinventory
    aecheyeperiod
    Hi.
    aecheyeperiod

    Seriously. Yeesh. I was annoyed with your mistakes too, but accusing you of never having graduated high school? Harsh.
    (PS: Not that formal education has anything to do with it. Donald Trump graduated from college and I didn't, but I'm smarter than him about pop culture, or anything else.)
    (PPS: Personally I love "Run

    So if we took violence against women more seriously (preventing it, punishing it and actually attempting rehabilitation) there is a good chance there would be less violence against women AND potentially fewer mass shootings? Sounds great, except social programs cost money and the controlling party thinks the

    "Scaring Trump big league," supposedly.

    I realize that, and don't expect him to be impeached any time soon, considering he was, in all seriousness, impeachable on day one of his presidency. I'm talking 25th amendment and the emoluments clause. (And he would have been impeachable before that, but I don't think you can impeach the president-elect.)

    NO SPRINGS!

    Fair enough. No need to put yourself through that. I won't watch 13 Reasons Why because I don't need to be reminded of my friends' suicides. And even though I want to see it eventually, I've put off Legion because of my own experiences with mental instability and addiction. Having said that, I've heard that some women

    Will this evidence that lefties can also be deranged gun nuts maybe get Republicans to rethink gun control? No? Well, at least I can respect them sticking to their professed beliefs. Their stupid, fucked-up, dangerous beliefs.

    That you present Colbert as the liberal equivalent of Breitbart or Limbaugh is strange. The better examples would be Rachel Maddow or Slate. Except that doesn't really work, because while Maddow and Slate have a liberal bent, they base their reporting and commentary on facts, whereas Breitbart and Limbaugh base their

    Unlike men, not all partisan animosities are created equal. If you do things worthy of animosity, like breaking laws and norms in the service of enriching yourself, fostering racism, and killing poor people, then you deserve the hate directed at you. If you make someone angry because you are working against racism and

    And Handmaid's Tale!

    "The greatest good for the greatest number of people" is actually a pretty great working definition of liberalism/progressivism/democratic socialism.

    What's so extreme about rejecting and mocking extremism? Trump's unethical behaviour, deplorable additude, and clear incompetence are all begging to be mocked, and it is not "extreme" to do so. It's reasonable and even commendable. Speaking truth to (corrupt) power while making people laugh is laudible.

    "I’m more and more convinced it likely won’t be in a way that isn’t as arbitrary and inexplicable as not-Dougie’s strange connection to that statue outside his office."
    Counterpoint: Inexplicable? That Coop would be drawn to a statue of a straight-backed young gunman with a noble bearing? Arbitrary? Idk, maybe too

    Second after you, Wally. May the road rise up to meet your wheels.

    It's "could've" (or "could have"), not "could of." Likewise, it's "would've" and not "would of."

    "In the original series, Andy and Lucy were wacky, sure, but they weren’t the useless dipshits they’ve been so far."
    Counterpoint: in the original series, Andy fails to successfully use scotch tape.

    Steve looked at you?

    Legit!

    Clubbers upset about the amount of political coverage on this site: the "deconstruction of the administrative state" comes in both Audio and Visual iterations. Seems to qualify, then.

    Biracial people can be black.