adsfasfasdfa
john smith
adsfasfasdfa

Wait, so what's the problem with clients reviewing and sharing information about the products/services they use?

You know when all those idiot trolls say women do not understand science, or don't belong in stem fields...yeah thanks for validating them with this idiotic drivel. The bar is already set higher for women...who needs MRA's when we have authors like you undermining women's credibility.

Look, the problem with Jezebel science reporting is different than the problem that most other media outlets face when it comes to science reporting. Usually the problem is that the reporter is inept at deciphering a scientific study and thus presents it is a misguided manner. The problem with Jezebel is far more

Yeah, how dare people suggest that obesity might lead to health problems? "sarcasm"

You know those female scientists y'all keep saying can't seem to find jobs with equal pay?

lul, you've all been trolled by the author.

Yep, just like the study shows.

PLEASE GET A SCIENCE WRITER, JEZEBEL!!! We would appreciate it very much.

This is one of the dumbest articles I've read on this site in a long time. As a scientist, I am horrified. This research has nothing to do with fat shaming, and you made yourself sound very unintelligent for trying to make it about fat shaming.

Amen

Sometimes being fat is bad for you. It just is. I wish the columnists here could accept that instead of blindly and fanatically rejecting the idea outright in the name of "open-mindedness" and "tolerance." At best, the reaction is immature...at worst, it's downright irresponsible and a little unbalanced (Lindy West).

Ugggh, please get a science writer, Jezebel.

Good Internet rule: Don't post anything you aren't comfortable having strangers view.

But you should care, because your goal is getting co-opted here. It has nothing to do with women, someone just read a few keywords that raised their ire and suddenly it's a gender/sex politic issue. Assinine.

We all need to be a lot more concerned about our planet than we are. Women maternal or otherwise, men, children...everybody...if this is how you need to sell it I don't really care so long as it gets done.

Considering the Gyms hours, that is more than ten percent and if men and women are paying the same I feel he has a valid point.

He's not wrong [in his conclusion that the gym should not be gender-segregated], he's just an asshole.

Yeah if I pay for a service and I can only access it some of the time because of my gender... I don't think I'd be paying for that service.... let it go and just drop the gym bubbykins.

Sadly, even he if was able to use those whole 442 hours he currently doesn't gave access to. It wouldn't be possible to develop enough muscle to adequately cover the huge chip on his shoulder.

Solution: the gym should dedicate 442 hour/year to men only excersise, thusly removing any notions of gender discrimination without removing any women only time at the gym.