What makes you thing think it's not still a fairly probable scenario? As an early 60's baby, I lived through much of the cold war, and things don't feel all that different right now. . .
adavaas
adavaas
You can't have your students thinking you drink water the same way they do? How exactly does a professor properly drink water? Out of an old old book from the Civil War era?
You can't have your students thinking you drink water the same way they do? How exactly does a professor properly…
I assume Turner was still thinking nuclear Armageddon here, so you'd play this when the incoming Soviet/Chinese missiles were 1 minute from impact, and all across America you'd be snuggled up with your loved ones on the couch waiting for the final crescendo to follow the end of that song.
Vote: Custom Water Cooling
If you want to play CoD, you might as well play CoD4. The game is the same each year.
As much as I 'hate' the idea of Hatred, I dislike censorship much more. If the game is a disgusting mess, then it'll exist and fail, condemning itself with its own actions. To censor it is to give it's message some validity, which it doesn't deserve.
They actually probably(?) breached the EU anti trust laws for having a double standard in what is, and isn't accepted on greenlight, when they control over 75% of the PC market.
By that same token, as much as I loathe this game, if I want to argue games are art I have to be willing to accept that there are some really horrible artists out there.
If I'm going to argue that games are art, I have to allow games like this to exist in the same world as games like Candy Crush and Bayonetta. Much like we allow Here Comes Honey Boo Boo and Human Centipede to exist alongside Citizen Kane and Frozen.
Nice to see that happening, but Valve failed in the communication department.
Can we all stop talking about this game? It's a stupid publicity stunt meant to make some people mad and make others defend it and all it really does is find ways to get itself into the headlines.
Wise decision; let the shitty game speak for itself. Gameplay looks terrible. Can't wait to play.
It's not a marketing ploy.
buying early access games as a gift is a dick move. the only people who should have early access are those who seek it, just like the article stated. early access is rough, full of glitches, risk of constant character resets. unless the person you're buying for said, i want this game early…
2nd time, "how much do you suppose this room would rent for?"
You know, I'm still surprised that this caused a controversy at all. I mean, how many civilians do people kill in GTA? Or in Saints Row? Or in Spec Ops? What makes this game any different? Or is this just creating a controversy because people are having as inconsistent of standards as Valve?
It's also everybody else's right to tell them they're stupid for doing it. Bitching on the internet got this game pulled, so if even more bitching on the internet gets it put back then what's the big deal?
not the same thing at all. he's saying as an individual, don't buy it, they're saying no one is allowed to buy it.
QUOTE | “If these folks had their way, none of those people would be able to buy Grand Theft Auto.” - Take-Two president Karl Slatoff reacting to Australian protestors who got GTA V pulled from some retailers; ultimately Slatoff believes “if you don't like it and it's offensive to you, then you don't buy it.”
ThinkGeek