It’s ridiculous that he’s running around saying that there were shackles and they had to “make” them fight, when the entire run-up to BvS was Snyder carrying on about how anyone who doesn’t think this is the real Batman and Superman just don’t know comics as well as he.

Seriously, this could have been SO easy. Have Lex Luthor team up with Poison Ivy. Lace her mind control shit with kryptonite to make it work really well on Supes. Bats has to fight him to save him, then they turn around and kick bad guy butt. Bonus, we get a better Ivy on the big screen than the B&R one.

I was coming here to make that exact same point and now I can’t.

Even if they have been learned, I don’t see much evidence that Snyder will be able to execute them. He’s never done anything that I would consider to have a light or hopeful outlook.

No kidding. That’s not an admission of a mistake, that’s straight up saying ‘people just didn’t get it.’ Good lord.

Yes, it’s such a shame fans were so silent about the problems with Man of Steel. If somebody had just said something, maybe the problems with Dawn of Justice could have been prevented.

Not to mention that “deconstruction” implies he understood the “construction” in the first place... but it’s OK, because Snyder sees himself as the second coming of Alan Moore.

My response was: Have lessons been learned? Are you sure they have been learned? Are you sure they haven’t...NOT been learned?

> They know mistakes were made with Man of Steel. Lessons have been learned.

“A bad guy with flying monkeys,” deadpans Batman.

“People don’t want their heroes deconstructed”

They know mistakes were made with Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. Lessons have been learned

If anything, they’re just giving Thiel more ammo. Keep it up, Gawker.

gawker you lost the case stop being so salty. heck I think Facebook shouldn’tdo business with a company that will release someone’s private sex tape.

People barely cared about this even when it was actually (briefly) part of the news cycle.

I find the implication that Thiel’s position on the board was ever in any Jeoprady because of what he did to Gawker highly misleading. The only controversy was the one Gawker tried, and failed, to create.

Listen up:

Sorry Gawker, you guys aren’t journalists being wronged. You’re a bunch of unethical muckrakers and you managed to piss off the wrong person...

Wow, this might be the first time I have agreed with Zuck!

I am getting sick of the pile on to oust people from positions for disagreeing with them on some crap. Gawker acted as unquestionable dickheads to Thiel, He had every legal right to retaliate the way he did. And Gawker is a way more powerful voice than some…

I often think about what I would do in these type of situations and tricking a wolf into getting attacked by a bear is not something I would think to do.