Greenpeace, phys.org, qz.com and newscientist.com are not legitimate news sources. The others are questionable as well but those are definitely off the list.

Yeah that’s not conservative doctrine.

Thid movie was terrible. In the future your life is terrible and you can’t fix it. Or something like that. Which is ok because the aliens need help in 3,000 but your kid dies.

Planks ad an extra challenge to my planks. Welp, time to bake a tray of brownies.

There is a middle ground. The key is to do it when you are in no danger of losing emotional control. Confront people when you aren’t emotionally upset and are prepared for a negative response.

Eric if you’re paying attention look at this post. Very clear good example and frankly helpful.

I guess I’m looking for more helpful quotes from that source then.

This article has potential but it’s going to take a bit more to get your point across. Your example is confusing and does not easily make your point and your conclusion seems obvious.

Well at least 4 years.

China is one of the most if not the most polluted nations on the earth. They burn more coal than anybody. They are a terrible example of a forward thinking nation. I was being sarcastic because it’s such a terrible example.

So... we should look to China as an example.

Sweet, something totally useless. Remember when Lifehacker used to do cool things?

I guess there is no hope for me. Look around you’re been spoon fed biased crap in the guise of journalism.

Well we shall see. There is no point in continuing to go back and forth. I can quote a bunch of sources that show it’s regulations. You will quote a bunch that say it’s other stuff. We will have to see.

Honestly I think you’re wrong on this one. If you’re right we’ll see it soon. Trump is going to cut the regulations which I believe killed coal. If I’m right they will begin a recovery.

WHen “green energy” becomes a profitable venture than sure it could go away but as of now 8 years of subsidizing the green revolution have given us very little to show for it.

See but that would be okay. Assuming what you are claiming is true. If there is a cheaper energy source in shale oil and it unseats coal, great! Let market forces dictate though, don’t let regulation and subsidies try and decide what will one day be profitable.

Seriously. I agree.

I answered it above.

You are forgetting her purge of her email server. Her handling of Benghazi. There were more than a few “questionable” moves that pointed toward dishonesty and corruption.