acmeopinonfactory
Acmeopinonfactory
acmeopinonfactory

All I ever saw in my Ducati’s mirror was my elbows

Oh man I listened to this the other day and wanted to talk about it so bad.

This. They go to Texas and then dealers from Georgia buy them and it’s all of a sudden a clean title again.

i don’t want to agree with you but i do. this thing looks a lot like an actual turd.

This is as close as you can get to factually objectively ugly. 

Because it’s ugly as shit. That’s why not.

Just. So. Ugly.

Speaking of British bombs, let’s pour out a 40… of Guinness

It’s Mike who could give you a rude shock. The cars he favors are competent but in an under-the-radar manner. A Marauder seems more than a little too overtly badass for him.

Certainly worth considering. That being said, It’s got almost 40,000 more miles and I read the LED conversion to mean some eBay garbage. I also see an aftermarket headunit that deserves a look into, and what’s attached to the side of the center console? And a “Black Ice” air freshener? All of it adds up to make me a

I think Marauders are cool as shit, but I’m not sure they have a “break you in half” mentality. They weren’t particularly fast when new (slower than a contemporary V6 Accord).  To me, these were a bit like a Harley Davidson.  More about the aura than the performance.

They could go to Irwindale speedway and use the drag strip or drift box.

The “Influencer” - Because the term “Online Panhandler” sounded too gauche.

Literally thousands. You just don't hear about them in stories like this because they aren't douchebags. 

When I first saw the pic I thought this was a Hindustan Ambassador.

Technically, steel is an alloy.

Am I the only one that thinks this is targeting dealers who buy new models only to turn around and sell them “used” days later at a huge mark up? That way they’d have to disclose that there was no manufacturer warranty.

So the battery is just sitting unsecured in the trunk?  I guess with 120hp, and probably inadequate brakes, it doesn’t really matter.

Now playing

Hmmm... this article is written in a voice that seems to fault California for protecting worker’s rights, rather than condemning the trucking companies that deliberately force drivers into working as contractors to avoid providing them livable wages or benefits.

The “fining passengers” aspect is somewhat interesting though.  Do they have some authority to do so hidden in the fine print of their ticketing agreement, or are they just sending a bill in a scary envelope as an intimidation tactic?