You clearly have no idea what it means to be a vegetarian. Since when do most vegetarians eat algae? Seriously? Was that supposed to be a really crappy joke, or do you honestly believe that's what vegetarians eat?

If you think that looks attractive in any way...you do not only drink Apple kool-aid, you swim in it.

Easily one of the most worthless Apple products ever released...devices just like this have existed for years now, with more capacity, battery life, a clip, and at a cheaper price. Why they even bothered making this product I have no idea when so many similar but better products have existed before it.

"Is taking out your iPad during dinner conversation even rude anymore?"

THIS JUST IN! People get upset when their shit breaks.

No, actually, I haven't distracted myself while driving. Mainly because I have common sense and realize that the safety of the other people on the road and in the car with me is a hell of a lot more important than anything else that could possibly be going on, like incoming texts.

While the Internet has the POTENTIAL has the potential to be incredibly dangerous (as does ANY tool, though to varying degrees of power), I disagree that it IS a dangerous tool at this point.

The reason I would say she's a bad parent is because she simply has no common sense, which she'll probably pass on to her kid...

...These are NOT ultra-realistic...why anyone would think so is beyond me...

@Lord_Data ∞: Perhaps those of you who have no self control are stuck in such a cycle. Those of us with discipline aren't.

It's simple. Just don't take your iPhone with you the next time you go out. Boom. Problem solved.

@snoop_dizzle: If it takes someone "a project or two" to build a computer, then they don't deserve to exist as a business. Because they suck and are too slow to accomplish anything.

I don't why this is such a problem for Gizmodo, but you guys really need to stop posting really old stuff and acting like you're reporting something new...this happens way too often.

Also: [www.newegg.com]

I would have no problem purchasing prints of works of arts instead of the real thing. If I think it will look good someplace, and it's cheap enough, I don't really care how authentic it is.

@Arggh! there goes a...snake a snake!: Unfortunately, yes. There are too many stupid people in the world who thinks that the name means something. It doesn't. End of story, at least for logical, rational people.

@suburbancowboy: Once again, you'd have to be an idiot to think a simple print would be worth the high price you'd be paying to someone trying to turn those $200m negatives into something profitable.

Why the hell would anyone in their right mind ever for any reason spend $200m on a photograph? It doesn't matter who shot it, if you spend that kind of money on some photos you're an idiot, plain and simple.

"but thanks to a very capable of transmission"

@trs: The adamo looks a hell of a lot nicer though.