acestephens--disqus
Ace Stephens
acestephens--disqus

Wait. So this isn't a movie about Jay Leno causing other hard-working comedians to starve by stealing their jobs and now those comedians are fighting back in an all-out epic, two-part roast?

A word with three whole syllables in a title? What is this - Shakespeare?

I'm not saying you are but I would never place responsibility for that on the work itself.

As I noted elsewhere here, I believe they are overselling its popularity - such as in the case of claiming there are "5 million Serial obsessives" - presumably on the base of misinterpretation/misrepresentation of facts and/or misreading of the pop culture climate. Which is ironic given the criticism directed at the

I bet we could have over 10 downloads/streams in the first five weeks!

As fellow Serial obsessives know—and there are more than 5 million of us now—Rabia Chaudry is the family friend of Adnan Syed who initially brought this case to Sarah Koenig at This American Life.

Well, they already remade Conquest Of and Battle For. Naturally, the third one should be the original! It's not?! SACRILEGE!

Not for my purposes…

I can't stop thinking about it. My doctors say I have a problem.

*downloads as much porn as possible, just to be safe*

*starts luting*

This is it, isn't it? This is the end. I always wondered what form it would arrive in. Plague. Famine. A flood of syrup from our IHOP overlords once they inevitably take over and install 4000-foot syrup tubs. But no. It was here. All along.

I often wonder what happens to all of the endless animation they do - which triples the budget by the way - in preparation to shoot the series. It's maddening that we don't hear more talk about that.

Gay people play games…in bed. ;-)

Exactly my point. We need to support serial rapists!

…The rules do have to do with comedy vs. drama but just not expressly in that example. Many, many people don't treat comedy as a serious artform so they find it "flippant" and extra offensive when its presented perspective doesn't align with their view - which is why we often get sitcoms where the "morality" winds up

I'm offended by the suggestion that they are or aren't or it might be irrelevant as well as the notion you've put forward that they are somehow "dogs" as though they are undeserving of human rights.

I'm offended by their intimacy and their lack of intimacy.

Part of his reluctance may come from the changing TV landscape, which
Lear says has made it more difficult to address controversial issues
than it was in the ’70s.

I agree there and (I don't know if this agrees or disagrees with your perception but here goes), regarding my personal view, I think there's a difference between being inauthentic and having a filter. I think there is a filter regarding her public image or similar which she isn't in complete control of (as is the