acestephens--disqus
Ace Stephens
acestephens--disqus

They might buy the character for that reason. But, oftentimes, since the market is "boys" (and yes, it's rigidly defined and they really should lead the market rather than playing catchup to crap gendered generalities from research that they then just self-justify or self-perpetuate or whatever…but that's how

They should play up the logo. If they really used it, it could become "the thing." It could show up prominently on future costumes and be used for some of her weaponry and such. Tie in a specific prop/weapon with that and you're nearing "solid action figure territory."

I just don't see how it could even begin to compare to the notion of changing Iron Man's armor design, whether he shoots this or that, having a removable helmet for each armor, having a version of just Tony Stark and one of him where you lock the armor on and one of him where blah blah blah.

Come on! How am I meant to get somebody like J-Boo to go back in time and kill me? He's already in the 1800s but…

That sounds…cool-ish?

Most of the things you described there sound like they're either "boring" (Loki's staff? WTF is she supposed to do with this?), not even hers (Loki's staff? WTF is she supposed to do with this?) or too big to fit with her figure (Loki's staff? WTF is…wait, no. Not for that one.) without significantly increasing

*sigh* Nobody's ever going to read my porno spec script, are they? No matter how subtle I try to be about it.

…why has the order come down to kill the superhero film now?

Her ass being there isn't so much an "ass shot" as far as I'm aware. And I don't recall specific ones in the Avengers or the Age of Ultron material itself. Sure, in associated stuff but that's neither here nor there exactly.

You're really screwing up my afternoon. …Now I'm gonna have to look up the word "metaphor" to see if you understand it.

Yeah, and if Transformers had as many movies as the MCU did and as many talented people involved, the film franchise would be decent. Also, I have no issue with 50 million more superhero movies. Or 50 million more period dramas. Or 50 million more road trip comedies. Presumably, other genres will continue to exist

Shit. I'm out.

There have been catsuit ass shots of Black Widow?!

Oh, so you want them to go make some real movies now? So billion-dollar franchise tentpoles commenting on government problems, social issues, privacy concerns, etc. aren't enough for you to consider them "real movies"?

I have dreams about Gillian Jacobs where if you showed the content of them to children, you'd be put in jail.

Who do I have to kill to own this?

Impossible! Regarding the former, I mean.

I'm trying to, relatively, "fit in" around here but I made a comment the other day that I felt was referential (certainly not reverential) regarding something awful and then spent the next couple of days, in the back of my mind, confused/concerned about whether anybody saw it as the "bad pun" of sorts I intended it to

I doubt anyone here would construe your comments as making light of the accusations (although I'm sure some people would…somewhere). I feel that humor, as with Hannibal's commentary (which people laugh at) that might otherwise be shouted down as "rape jokes" merely by mentioning the subject…is often a great means of

I know I clearly haven't watched the shows. I just said as much in "I wouldn't know." following questioning what they do or don't do. Trick arrows isn't quite the same as pulpy and absurd to me - over-the-top, sure. As for "attempts to be realistic" excluding the suggestion of controlling the weather (There are