No. Anti-comedy is more like this:

But, you have to admit, HAHA BUMS LOL.

*waits patiently for someone to stroll in with a misguided comment about how gender constructs don't exist in a vacuum*

When taking any firm stance on prominent and divisive issues as a matter of course, the two most preferable responses would likely be either effusive praise or blunt condemnation/insult.

I have seen that, though.

I actually started following these tips this morning and now I've already made it in stand-up!

She should have known better.

This is the worst thing I've ever seen…and therefore the best thing I've ever seen.

I don't know. It's an interesting question. They're already mixing so many of these characters together in another given individual's film that I question what the point of any of it is outside of branding. I know there are people who greatly like Black Widow but I question if the push for her to have her own film…

I think they're relying on people like you. To value the character and see the films regardless. And to, when the opportunity arises, point out the obvious prospects of doing the film.

I feel like this is all part of their plan (the "clamoring" for it, fan scripts, buzz, whatever…). If they never get around to it, they get to go, "See? We told you." If they do get around to it, they get to go, "Overwhelming support at the suggestion essentially forced our hand. Fans love the character!" Either…

Great! I love The Carpenters!

I don't see those siege movie or 70s conspiracy thriller elements. Maybe you can give me an outline that sort of ties how it progresses into that. But I never saw that originally while I did see the Western elements even in some things that others didn't seem to think fit or didn't think made sense for the film at…

Next time, I'll try to wait until your second reply before unnecessarily prejudging your intentions! :-P

As far as my comment on modernity in the film, I wasn't referring so much to the technology in the movie as I was to the movie's interest in commenting on modern-day concepts of terrorism and law and order.

But I feel like you're missing the "pretty much" part of what was originally said that I followed up on? Why would someone think something is meant to be a literal, one-to-one construct when somebody says "pretty much"?

Alrighty then. I just felt I was jostling with someone on a moot point brought up to discourage me and that getting that out of the way - by basically saying "That work's up to you" would clarify my position and distance me from having to answer a question you clearly wanted an answer for yet didn't seem likely to…

To me it felt like you were ignoring evident examples you yourself could probably name off the top of your head which share various traits in common with what I described…in order to get me to either say or not say them so you could tell me I was wrong anyway. So if you disagreed, why didn't you outline that rather…

"Western" describes a genre archetype which takes place in a typical setting. To say TDKR is "basically a Western" is not to say that it is a Western.

Where the bad guy gets the good guy (or guys) driven out of the area? …I can't even name all of them. Where the primary good guy (sometimes a sheriff, sometimes the only guy standing up to the sheriff) at least appears to die (if not dying) or be on his deathbed? Plenty. Where there's a girl who doesn't quite fit…