…What exactly are you referring to?

You think Matty Banks is going to be a DJ?

To be fair, though, Ledger was hilarious in that Brokeback movie.

Mr. Mom?! HAHAHAHAHAA. WTF.

I seriously don't understand the suggestion that this is some sort of "victory" in the immediate as having any basis in reason.

I think Aronofsky or similar who have shown interest in developing/directing franchise properties in the past would be good. And I understand Disney's relative aversion - I'm not asking for something particularly (or even…much at all) "experimental." I'm just asking for something where I can go, "Yeah, this is of…

I just feel like, for the most part, we're getting very similar voices. If this was some "new" or "different" thing like a three-part storyline being made all at once by a bunch of independent directors who each film one movie, I might get it. But it's Star Wars and its related spinoffs (this vast universe of…

It's an extension of the style. Particularly if you consider something like Super 8 being the bridge that allows it. But the notion roughly is that young people come across some mystical/extraterrestrial/unknown force and explore it through various telegraphed means in a manner which (even in the case of "found…

Give me more fashion tips, homophobe.

You need to apologize to the Asian Community.

…Were you in a coma for the past two decades?

Oh, great. I can't wait for yet another franchise film with an extremely formulaic narrative that is directed by someone who needlessly imitates Spielberg!

I don't know about any of you but I avoided seeing it due to good, old-fashioned racism.

It's not the full story regarding casting, and anybody who gave it a bit of consideration or even looked into the matter at the time without jumping to conclusions would have easily recognized this. You don't have to see the movie to have the "full story" available to date regarding what actors might be cast.

I do not disagree there.

When it's a production shrouded in secrecy and with a few major (likely true) rumors surrounding it and the first and only piece of publicity they put out seems to confirm what some people were expecting and fearing would happen (despite the major rumors indicating that such a thing is not the case and the production…

I feel like you're citing the symptom as the disease. Darabont left because AMC refused to agree with him on a direction for the show (because he was fighting for more and they wanted less). Then, after the second season showed them that the show might be financially worthwhile, they decided to let it have a bit…

If they had faith in it based on how well it was doing, why did they cut the budget for the second season? You know, the one that gets so much criticism for seeming like it set off on a strange path and then it got convoluted and kind of went nowhere? The one where he left about halfway through because of this type…

I think there is enough evidence to indicate that the lack of AMC's faith in the show (including their financial restrictions and even cutting the budget once it was a clear success) and the resulting compromises this forced Darabont to make over and over again despite his concerns being clear were what was holding…

As you'll see if you look above, the actions were referred to as "protests" - not "voicing concerns." Which is a bit different as one can easily question what's going on but when one protests, that's generally an active stance against something. In the case mentioned above, against something…that wasn't confirmed to…