Hmmm... I was pretty sure it was a throwback design to the 2000GT.

It’s been in Toyota’s styling for a long time.

designed by a team consisting of over 1800 people

How could you miss that?

Isn’t engine intakes associated with breathing rather than eating? Wouldn’t that makes the exhaust closer to a mouth (you know, breathe in through the nose and out through the mouth, or so I’ve been told).

How much will it cost to opt them out?

It’s for simplicity. Unless it’s required by the regulation, choosing overly complex modern engine offer little to no advantage in racing application.

If the car has no intention to stop, sure, 112 & 130 mph wouldn’t make any difference. But under braking, 112 & 130 mph would make a huge difference in stopping distance.

It’s probably the limit of their crash prevention system rather than their crash protection structure.

If the current “Celica” is made by Subaru and the new Supra is made by BMW, who’s going to make the new MR2? Lotus?

WAKE DAYO!!!

The key word is “unsecured”. Whether using a sedan or a proper truck with proper bed doesn’t matter, if the load is unsecured then they carry the same risk.

Isn’t hydrogen a byproduct of charging?

No. Just like the racing version of 4A-GE (240hp@10k rpm), they’re dedicated race engine, not modified road engine. All they share with their road going counterparts is probably just bore x stroke.

I think some sort of success ballast would help to make the field more competitive.

Nah, they should go with gas turbine.

The ABS goes up to eleven!

My country also bans used cars import but allowed brand new cars. Makes me wonder, between that and only able to import older than 25 years old cars, which is sillier?

In case anyone need something official, although I do wonder if DIN has it’s own specifications for this.

Minivan: -300 points