Eww - Canon.

...and is in-line with the writer's writing style and tone of the article. If he wished to be consistent, then my suggestion is still correct.

It's accepted either way. Except that the method put-forth by the Times and WSJ supports financial motives . . .

Lol — I approve!

Technically, while the overall company is classified as "news media," Gizmodo is a blog. Gizmodo does not need to adhere to a higher standard of journalistic-composure, so I never take it as such. Yet, there are times where articles are just blatantly published without proofreading that my eyes hurt after reading…

Yes, except DARPA refers to themselves as such:

I agree - a copy editor would be tremendous. However, a little proofreading would go a long way as well . . .

Lol, no?

I can't begin to tell you how much I love you and agree with you. Summer Glau is the answer to anything and everything.

Hearted. Awesome. I need this on a t-shirt

Thanks!

I liked this response: Solid, though-out and well-reasoned. You stayed on topic, met the article demographic and provided good insight - I felt you deserved an approval!

What's more fun that spinning a dead baby around on a clothesline at 200mph?

Anyone else see a slew of dead baby jokes just waiting to happen?

Ahhh — There was an open source story on Android early today. My apologies. But then again, that does not absolve your comment from being mildly obscure.

Pretty sure you commented on the wrong story . . .

I'm sure that if you remain resolute and headstrong, you'll prosper over those comments.

Let this be a lesson to all: DIY projects don't always get you ahead.

"Brain.a was infected the boot section of computers running PC-DOS."