accesscode
accesscode
accesscode

I agree, but aren’t we talking specifically about the movement which this March represents and highlights? I’m not a huge fan of that movement, either. This idea that there is some kind of ambiguous amorphous “feminist” movement out there to which we can belong or not is nonsense. In reality, either we’re participants

Honestly, it’s pretty clear you’re an ass. I believe we can care about both. We can be concerned about an assault on a person that could have led to his death, and we can be concerned about women’s concerns being taken seriously.

You’re right it is. But why, then, antagonize zionists instead of coming together and realizing that bigotry needs to combated together?

You’re right that it’s a bad reason to abandon feminism, but I think what she may be saying is it’s a reason she doesn’t feel welcome at events anymore. My wife took our daughter to a march in California, it was a big day and my wife was very excited to share that experience with her daughter. Until she was harassed

Right, except Linda Sarsour is one of the people who has a voice in what mainstream feminism is like right now, and is using that voice to further her own political agenda, at a time when antisemitism is already on the rise.

So, I’m not sure if you are aware, but her headline (and indeed the entire piece) is actually a response to several things, primarily comments made by Linda Sarsour that you cannot be a Zionist and a Feminist.

I know (from other comments) what this was supposed to be about, but it reads waaaay too much like a smarmy poke at the various groups (such as LGBT people, people of color, etc.) that have had to fight for a long time for inclusion. For queer people especially, there’s still a lot of folks out there who view our

Please, NYT. Spare us.

He’s gonna end up deep-throating his foot. Wait for it.

No lie, that sounds like Donald Trump tweeting from Deeley’s account.

Don’t be. We need Spicer and Conway to stay on the “Tangerine Toupee Terror Train” for the entirety of Trump’s reign. Seeing them spin his bullshit is the most joy we’ll ever receive out of this clusterfuckgeddonpocalypse.

This is a crowd of Bernouts. They don’t like Eichenwald because he criticized the Bern. That’s what you have to understand.

Don’t let these Bernouts guilt you.

You’re never going to win with this crowd. They’re Bernouts. Eichenwald criticized Bernie. Therefore, they’re going to complain. Had he been a Bernie supporter — say, Robert Reich — they wouldn’t be complaining.

Same here. This was almost an amazing start to the weekend :(.

This was funny, but when I saw the title on Twitter it really god my hopes up that he had been fired.

Both scenarios should be taken seriously, but with Eichenwald, law enforcement can take action because there was an actual assault. In the case of the gamergate threats, I imagine it’s harder for them to take action because it’s been all talk.

...But nobody is arguing differently? I haven’t seen anybody here argue that women who are harassed shouldn’t be taken seriously. You’re arguing a point nobody disputed. I did point out that legally, Quinn and Eichenwald are regarded as different because his case would be classified as an actual assault, whereas her’s

This headline/framing is a depressing example of how all of us, even those that hate trump, have internalized his divisive, with-us-or-against-us rhetoric that nonsensically twists every story into a battle. And, like trump, it is selfish, shortsighted, and incredibly damaging - because it’s not only about whatever

This is the guy who broke about a third of the damning stories against Trump and continues to do so so, of course, the FBI has him on their radar. Eichenwald doesn’t deserve to be some clickbait.