I disagree. These guys would do this whether articles like these exist or not. I worked with men like these, and they genuinely believe the shit they spew and actively try to “help” others by getting them to see their perspective.

Pretty sure they do it because they genuinely hate woman. Incels gonna incel.

I don’t know where you got that info, but it’s wrong.

Apple charges the same amount that you pay a license to make an Xbox or PS game, get a clue.

And I’m sure that as soon as a critical mass of consumers has a problem with that, their sales will tank.

TadBravo is a twat. He frequently dismisses comments that correct him and he always tries to make himself seem better than the average person.

Yep. It did its job and got me instantly interested in a game I knew nothing about. I think it looks great.

Asking for special treatment for yourself and also hoping Apple would extend it to others is not the same as not asking for special treatment.

We didn’t get rid of walled gardens, we made the walls invisible. I worked in a very large for-profit University hospital for years. Do you know how many of it’s medical staff ate in the cafeteria, rented apartments in a building owned by the University, and shopped in stores in a building owned by the university?…

Except there is no other store in town and there doesn’t have to be because Apple built and owns the town. If you want your game on their platform, and you want to profit from their install base, you play by their rules. We’re not talking about an open source OS on third party hardware. Everything here belongs to…

Everyone “cancels” things they don’t like, this isn’t novel. Conservatives just really don’t like when it is used against them, since it makes them choose between money and their prejudices, which is sometimes really hard. So they gave it a name that triggered people.

What I think is interesting here is the underlying role capitalism plays in this thinking. The “Canceling” of Tennapel in this case basically consists of “don’t buy this dude’s game.” If it’s unethical to not buy a product because you morally disagree with its owners or creators, doesn’t that suggest that it’s more or…

Listen man, I’m not saying no one is ever allowed to watch Mad Max because Mel Gibson is antisemetic, I’m not saying no one is allowed to watch X-Men because Bryan Singer is a pedophile, I’m not saying no one is allowed to watch anything produced by rapist Harvey Weinstein, I’m not saying no one is allowed to watch…

I mean, “I don’t want to associate with this person because I find them awful,” doesn’t seem immature to me. Like, I can enjoy media and personalities that are problematic or toxic to varying degrees, but I have to take them in context. The context here is that it’s 2020, and Doug TenApel was involved, so within that…

I’m sorry, but we “canceled” fucking Nazis back in 1945. My grandfather didn’t die killing those fucks so people like this asshole and you can have a “difference of opinion”. He should be punched in the face at every opportunity. As for your “both sides” comment. Your Gamergate is showing. Fuck off.

That’s the biggest problem with American especially on the Republican side. They just have to put labels on everything and skew the meaning of everything to fit the label.

If a little “curb contact” busts a ball joint or breaks a control arm, your car is a piece of shit. Go walk down your street and you’ll probably find curb rash on 9 out of 10 sets of wheels. Then note how many of them also have busted ball joints.

Yes because she is the one who should be telling this asshole to not be a creep. Clearly Mike Zaimont is not an adult that should have some understanding to just take the compliment without being a creep. As we all know, it’s the woman’s job to not be harassed. /s

It’s not really her responsibility to ask someone not to be a creep towards her.