Thanks for the headline that spoiled GoT for me. I was reading another article and I refreshed the page and saw this.
Greetings from Europe, where we have to wait a day to get to watch the episode. Eff-you Jezebel, you’re from now on banned from my list of favorite websites to read with my morning coffee.

I’m sorry, I have to say something. I’m a Bernie supporter, and a longtime Jezebel reader, AND I was there in the room. I shot some videos that have been aired on major networks, and I actually have a relatively neutral perspective. Could you please interview me for an alternate view of what happened, instead of just…

I stayed off of io9 so I’d avoid spoilers until I saw the movie yesterday. I didn’t think I needed to stay off of your fucking sports blog, too.

I follow this site daily so fuck off—spoilers are bullshit and you assholes knew what you were doing with the headline. So of course people object and what do you do? Double-down on the assholery, ‘natch. Fuck you, douche canoe.

“Grow up” – spoken like a true manbaby

Or you could, and get this, not post spoiler filled article titles for movies that came out THREE DAYS AGO and then repost it to the sports board.

The movie’s just 3 days old, in America at least. No one’s asking for the article to be edited - just the title.

Normally I’d agree with this sentiment, but given that it just released this past Friday the title could have been worded better.

No one said it should. But it’s common sense to avoid spoilers in a title.

I was cracking up (or cringing in a good way) almost the entire time. The “Obama’s hair is so white it says all lives matter” killed me. And the part about Morning Joe was so incredibly real. Don Lemon actually handled it the best in my opinion. Yes he flipped him off but it was obviously in a joking way.

The reasoning of having every suit variation requiring a sliding sprite might be the best explanation. There is a mechanic in the game that is used only once (World 1-5) that forces Mario to slide without player input. It probably could have been for that reason alone.

It’s a better idea to list real pros and cons of both candidates then the bs you posted. But then, you aren’t looking for dialog, just pushing opinion.

I’d say this is more like stealing a cable broadcast as it existed a decade ago, with those programs and all. It’s still a bit murky just because a legal, paying alternative does exist, but whether those alternatives are really interchangeable is a subject for debate.

The answer to your questions are:

the First Amendment does not apply here. This is a private film festival. The first amendment is designed to prevent the government from punishing or preventing speech and expression. An organizer deciding to pull a film from a festival has zero first amendment implications.

How dare she push for something that she was contractually entitled to, how dare she. I’m sure she probably was an asshole in other ways, but I’m on her side in not letting them slide on those ones.

This is probably the most controversial thing Christopher Reeve said:

As another perpetual single this is something that I’m dying to know as well.

Right? If we are explicitly being told to vote for her because she’s a woman, I think it’s fair for someone to point out that just because she’s a woman doesn’t mean she’d be a great President.