Your graph is in unadjusted dollars which makes it very difficult to interpret in a meaningful way.

What *is* how it works is that I don’t support their business model so I don’t patronize their business. If there is something I want to see, I buy it outright, commercial free. And if that format isn’t available - fuck ‘em.

If they’re going to shove a shitload of advertisements and product placement down my throat then yes, they damn well better not be charging me for it too.
But they are, and they would be, so, I didn’t watch any of it. At all.

Imagine the outcry if someone put the Space Needle in a shot of Portland. Portlanders would lose their shit. This is like that, but with hundreds of years of conflict underlying it.

Balloons. Lots and lots of balloons.

There is a time and a place for oatmeal raisin, and it typically involves a mug of hot mulled cider.

The first 2/3rds of Ghostbusters (2016) were actually pretty good, it just went completely off the rails towards the end.

Nonsense. Ian McKellen is 100% a wizard.

Incense is an exception, but an irrelevant one since; first, you have to buy one to begin with (except for the few free ones you get as levelup rewards) and, second, *you* choose when to turn it on. You could simply camp on top of a pokestop and replenish your inventory between spawns. Hardly something that could be…

If they did this it would be easy to confirm, you’d simply have to look for a instances where high rarity (or any, really) pokemon spawn for one player but not others. However, the existence and nonexistent failure (in terms of spawn prediction) rate of the Pokevision application, this is not the case. With a sample…

Nope, everyone always sees the same spawns.

That’s literally impossible. The spawns are shared across every account that’s in range from the moment it spawns to the moment it’s fixed timer ends. As long as you get to it in time, you’ll see the exact same thing as everyone else.

It would actually be impossible in Pokemon GO since each spawn is shared across the entire playerbase. As soon as someone enters an area, they’ll see the same pokemon as everyone else there.

No, this is not the case - and it would actually be impossible. The pokemon population in any area is the same for everyone and most of the time, two people of the same level will see the pokemon at the same strength (although there is some randomness to that).

If you and I were both level 10 and were standing side by…

PokemonGO uses Google (or, also external, Nintendo Pokemon Trainer Club) accounts for login authentication. I doubt you could steal login information from Niantic even if you could get in.

No, I did a side by side comparison during the beta. It’s significantly worse than Ingress on the same phone (and they’re basically the same game). They made some improvements towards the end, but it’s still worse. They’re apparently working on it. Its still not a v1.0 release (its like 0.29)

So what you’re saying is that if we scaled human brains to the bird-fab process, you could double our neuronal number in the same packing volume and dramatically increase the human intelligence ceiling.
Like the efficiency gains from moving a processor from a 22nm fab to a 12 nm fab.

Oh hell yeah. This movie sucked (sorry, the fight scenes and the magics were cool but otherwise, blegh). But bring on the Lich King!

Respectfully, go to hell.

Don’t put spoilers in your titles, it’s that simple. What the fuck is your problem?!