At least you’re Not Even Mad though
ABurnerHasNoName
aburnerhasnoname
Right? How many of those millions of Americans killed defending the flag were killed by people from South Carolina? Because I’m going to guess the number is pretty high relative to every state north of the Mason-Dixon Line and west of Texas.
I hope you’re right (that he’ll do well), but it would certainly be bucking the trend. Isn’t the SOTU response generally considered a “can’t win”-type job?
Yes. I do.
Do you understand the difference between presiding over the case and rendering a judgment? A judge isn’t supposed to be neutral while rendering judgment on a verdict (or guilty plea, in this case). The case is decided. The judge has taken into consideration the evidence in mitigation and aggravation (including victim…
To be fair, he may have been - he just also happened to definitely be guilty. I don’t think a jury couldn’t convict on what they heard. That one is on LAPD for (a) allowing a man who’d admitted on tape that he sometimes planted evidence on black suspects he believed were guilty to be the lead detective; and (b)…
33 checking in - have climbed rope in gym class
So is what I can see of the meso-American portion. But the point it’s trying to make stands
He was also a prolific car thief, leading to him inventing/patening improved car alarms based on his, uh, frontline knowledge of the shortcomings of the then-prevailing tech. He parlayed that into immense personal wealth (wealthiest sitting member of either chamber, I believe).
I don’t get the cartoon this time - is the bbc charging people differently based on gender or something?
Right, I understand that - and the assets poured over in the trust would avoid probate. Nonetheless, the pour-over will itself would still need to be probated, and why would you expect the second wife (who is in executrix under the will) to not probate it in the same nonconvential way requiring everyone to appear? As…
I can’t believe what this administration is doing to American families. It’s truly an outrage.
How would that avoid this situation? They’d still need to probate the pour-over will
Yeah I thought it was a totally laughable premise for that reason. No one - *no one* - would have thought it was a good idea to put that content blocker into children. The concept never would have made it past the whiteboard.
I think he’s confusing (i) the fact representative are usually adressed as “Congressman/Congresswoman” while senators are usually addressed as “Senator” with (ii) the fact that, honorifics notwithstanding, both the HoR and Senate collectively make up the legislative branch of the federal government called “Congress.”
Even if the Supreme Court rules gerrymandering is unconstitutional, I’m not sure new districts would be drawn up in time for the midterms. Especially since you’d expect as a matter of procedure that there would then need to be a separate challenge in each state saying “this map is also unconstitutionally gerrymandered…
Nut-ture will, uh, find a way.
I agree with you by and large. There’s a bunch of games I’d like to have on switch, but I can’t justify paying what they’re asking for something I already have X copies of. Seems like it will work itself out over time though - people will buy at the original price if they don’t already have the game, and wait for a…
Turns out “this is a joke but also probably will happen” is the official motto of 2017