I agree with you by and large. There’s a bunch of games I’d like to have on switch, but I can’t justify paying what they’re asking for something I already have X copies of. Seems like it will work itself out over time though - people will buy at the original price if they don’t already have the game, and wait for a…

Turns out “this is a joke but also probably will happen” is the official motto of 2017

(He already has: https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2017/01/28/politics/white-house-holocaust-memorial-day/index.html)

Oh wow. This is ... something.

Well there must have been at least - I dunno - 2 or 3 hours during his 10 day tenure where he wasn’t talking to the media, so maybe he could write something covering those precious few moments very, very deeply?

?

Brooklynite sounds a little weird, but all the other formulations I can think of sound even worse.

Yo - where’s my UK update at?

I agree, but I’d also say that’s easier at a local level than national.

Just for decoration? I’ve been using Colorado-shaped cutting boards for chopping my entire life. Depending on the job, sometimes I’ll bust out a Dakota instead.

I actually like it a lot (not from MD, for the record). At least it’s not just the state seal on a blue background like about 50% of them.

Wait really? Lithgow? Oh no - what did he do?

Yeah, except I’m pretty sure “press” is a euphemism for something ... else, in his case.

He also has no reasonable expectation of privacy in statements made to a police officer arresting him in public. So California’s two party consent statute - which I assume is what he is invoking here - doesn’t apply (it covers confidential comms only)

Is this a serious comment? Who gives a fuck? Maybe David Duke works at soup kitchens - he’s still a piece of shit

Not buying it. Being sick didn’t make him an anti-semite. Being an anti-semite made him an anti-semite.

Agreed - he just barely catches himself, but still slips into the Jewish conspiracy tropes. It’s almost like it’s a deeply-held belief of his, and not just the product of drink/nerves.

“We’ll call it the press”

To the extent that first paragraph is even parseable, you haven’t pointed out any “contradiction.” I agree with OP - she got off lightly when one takes into consideration what she admitted about her intent. (And if you don’t see how her confession could be interpreted as a statement of intent to kill, I don’t know…

(1) don’t be obtuse. someone expressed shock she received such a light sentence in light of her confession, because her words indicated she intended to kill him. Your response that the sentence was based on the crime she was charged with and not “her words” was asinine - the difference between the charge prosecuted…