Wait really? Lithgow? Oh no - what did he do?

Yeah, except I’m pretty sure “press” is a euphemism for something ... else, in his case.

He also has no reasonable expectation of privacy in statements made to a police officer arresting him in public. So California’s two party consent statute - which I assume is what he is invoking here - doesn’t apply (it covers confidential comms only)

Is this a serious comment? Who gives a fuck? Maybe David Duke works at soup kitchens - he’s still a piece of shit

Not buying it. Being sick didn’t make him an anti-semite. Being an anti-semite made him an anti-semite.

Agreed - he just barely catches himself, but still slips into the Jewish conspiracy tropes. It’s almost like it’s a deeply-held belief of his, and not just the product of drink/nerves.

“We’ll call it the press”

To the extent that first paragraph is even parseable, you haven’t pointed out any “contradiction.” I agree with OP - she got off lightly when one takes into consideration what she admitted about her intent. (And if you don’t see how her confession could be interpreted as a statement of intent to kill, I don’t know…

(1) don’t be obtuse. someone expressed shock she received such a light sentence in light of her confession, because her words indicated she intended to kill him. Your response that the sentence was based on the crime she was charged with and not “her words” was asinine - the difference between the charge prosecuted…

It’s something of value you receive in exchange for your services. It definitely shouldn’t be taxable income, but it fits the definition of income.

Yes, exactly! Private property *and* private contract are supposed to be at the core of libertarian belief - goes to show that it isn’t really about idealized principles of government non-interference for most “libertarians,” but about wanting to get away with being assholes.

Yes, I read the article and understand what you are saying.

This ignores that her words are evidence of her culpable mental state, which is literally the only difference between the crime she was charged with and other crimes that carry more serious sentences.

Committing negligent acts that cause the death of another is the definition negligent homicide.

Is this like a regional thing? I’ve never heard of Papa Murphy’s as far as I can remember (I’ve lived in Chicago; Lawrence, Kansas; and Los Angeles).

It’s amazing how narratives take hold and then become the path of least resistance for media coverage.

Time has changed nothing. The list remains outrageous.

Post on /r/tipofmyjoystick

What does this have to do with anything? Are you comparing NFL players to your 6 year old?

You don’t seem to have followed where the “90%” in his comment came from.