Sorry, I thought you were referring to Mace, because that’s the only doltish Tyrell I can remember.

Assuming you are referring to Mace, I believe he was her son

jesus - do you need a hug or something?

This isn’t really 100% correct though. Building codes (as the term is usually used) are creatures of state law. The president cannot pardon a violation of a building code, because the president is not sovereign vis-a-vis state law. The governor could tho

Agreed - but if I were USA and knew this is what was on the table for the state charges, i’d be looking to contrive that federal jx hook somehow.

Fucking Christ - can someone please teach the man how to tie a tie? Getting ridiculous

JEFFREY is a great record

Wow - assuming this exchange is basically representative, I’m impressed by how much the British know about the particulars of their navy.

The latter, per SCOTUS: “A law enacted after expiration of a previously applicable limitations period violates the Ex Post Facto clause when it is applied to revive a previously time-barred prosecution.” Stogner v. California, 539 U.S. 607, 632-33 (2003).

Next time, just put the word “snowflake” first so I know you have nothing interesting to say without having to read the whole moronic sentence. Thanks!

Right? What a creepy and tone deaf comment by the lawyer.

I was praying for guilty, but haven’t followed closely enough to weigh the evidence presented by each side, but I have to point out: that absolutely is *not* the standard for a criminal case. The defense bears no burden whatsoever. All that matters is whether the state proves every element of a charged offense beyond…

/r/accidentalrenaissance

Cool, thanks! Gonna watch tonight

Been meaning to check that out - sounds like you recommend it?

You really didn’t understand their point? Or just being a dick?

Well, he seems nice!

This is a (speculative) explanation, not a defense: I think he was *certain* Clinton would win, so he was worried about fall out to his reputation and the FBI (and maybe even threats to her legitimacy) if it came out he was sitting on info after the election. I think it never crossed his mind that there was a chance…

Because the White House counsel represents the office of the president, not the man himself. A subtle distinction sometimes, but in cases like this can be quite important. It’s the same reason a corporation and its officers may have separate counsel when sued together. Potential conflicts.

Feel free to put them in their proper context.