No, he made a strawman claim that it’s acceptable for society to stereotype everyone except Jews. Which is BS because the exact group of “wokesters” he targets find it equally unacceptable to call Blacks a gang, Italians a mob, or Jews a “cabal”. There’s no one who does that except you know, the White Supremacist bros…

You’re right. He explicitly said that Jews do not control Hollywood. And then spent ten minutes implying that in fact they do.

Hear me out, WHAT IF we stopped caring so much about what entertainers, sports stars and models think about politics and diverted our attention to the thinkers and intellectuals among us for all things ‘thinky’?

George Lucas has always said that Star Wars was a fairy tale for children. That certainly tracked with the prequels, particularly Phantom Menace. The Abrams sequels were Star Wars for adults in arrested development.

Am I bad person if I find that anecdote hilarious?

What you wrote and the fact that the party’s response to, say, Pramila Jayapal has been markedly different, are both true things.

I agree the conversation needs to consider the whole picture.

I mean Hollywood is run by corporations that are largely run by Republicans, but sure...

Yeah, I don’t keep up with celebrity stuff too much but their story sticks out to me for being weird. I remember that when news came out about their split and people were asking him why they separated, his only response to that was, “I wish I knew. Maybe someday I’ll understand why”. That stood out to me because it…

Really tired of hearing and reading about Wilde’s attempt to spin this bullshit.

“there’s a reason I left that relationship.. and that reason’s name is Harry Styles”

That’s how compromise works, though. Some people are disappointed. Some people are helped out a lot. Nobody gets everything of what they wanted.

On the one hand, I get it. This isn’t much of anything to a lot of borrowers. Especially when interest rates have been static for so long (member of the 8.5% club for years!). My balance will be right back where it was in like 9 months after interest resumes.

It was because of the headline, I came in here ready to throw down.  I’m glad that the article is positive, but man, that headline is just gross.

You do realize that calling them ‘sad boys’ is rude AF right? Women complain about men not being open with their emotions/feelings, and yet here you are, insulting them when they do open up about it?

Welcome to Jez so call not feminist website 

The fuck is up with that title? The article is supportive at least but seriously... the fuck is with that borderline sarcastic tone and condescending tagline:

It’s a real fun twist for a site that is generally critical of toxic masculinity and positive about destigmatizing mental health issues to dismiss men who are open about their mental health struggles as “sad boys.”

It’s very weird to see Jezebel rewrite it’s attitude to the 2016 elections. Most of the writers have left now, but this site was decidedly anti Hillary Clinton.

Using their own terminology here (not mine)... she murdered 2 kids. And, assuming it’s true, now she’s lying about it. She should go to jail.