It was because of the headline, I came in here ready to throw down.  I’m glad that the article is positive, but man, that headline is just gross.

You do realize that calling them ‘sad boys’ is rude AF right? Women complain about men not being open with their emotions/feelings, and yet here you are, insulting them when they do open up about it?

Welcome to Jez so call not feminist website 

The fuck is up with that title? The article is supportive at least but seriously... the fuck is with that borderline sarcastic tone and condescending tagline:

It’s a real fun twist for a site that is generally critical of toxic masculinity and positive about destigmatizing mental health issues to dismiss men who are open about their mental health struggles as “sad boys.”

It’s very weird to see Jezebel rewrite it’s attitude to the 2016 elections. Most of the writers have left now, but this site was decidedly anti Hillary Clinton.

Using their own terminology here (not mine)... she murdered 2 kids. And, assuming it’s true, now she’s lying about it. She should go to jail. 

Gtfoh with this bullshit. You know damn well that this story (assuming it’s true) isn’t simply about someone “changing their mind about something.” You also know damn well that if Boebert simply had a “personal opinion” about abortion, there wouldn’t be a problem. Guess what, everyone has a personal opinion about…

Alora: Can you honestly say that no child suffers for the benefit of your Federation? That no child lives in poverty or squalor while those who enjoy abundance look away?

LMAO wasted energy shit-posting about who is a “Real” leftist literally proves my point.

Isn’t the whole point of Stranger Things the repetition of tropes from 1980s adventure/sci-fi/teen movies? It’s all deliberate homage.

You may not know this, but the Clinton’s both ran for President (and one of them even won! Twice!) on the ticket of the “liberal” of the two major parties in the United States. What a wild idea! Now, are they as liberal as you or me? Probably not. But you can’t No True Scotsman them out of our end of the political…

This piece is grossly ignorant of the larger gun lobby landscape. It also seems to be ignorant of the legislative process.

Those people are more likely to give money to politicians,

Not entirely sure all the links you posted are fully supporting your thesis. Yes, their spending is down and they’re facing financial troubles, membership has decline. But it seems their legacy and and influence is still alive and well..

And aside from other lobbying organizations besides the NRA, gun manufacturers are major GOP donors. It’s mind boggling but typical of recent Jezebel commentary that these articles are so poorly informed and researched.

The NRA might be in the public discourse most, but it is not the only powerful gun lobby organization. For example, Gun Owners of America and the National Association for Gun Rights are much smaller budget-wise but have large memberships and are arguably more powerful than the NRA behind the scenes these days. They’re…

I mean, the best way to stop Russian troops from raping Ukrainian women is to get Russian troops the fuck out of Ukraine. Am I missing something?

What world inaction? Western nations are providing huge amounts of support to Ukraine and heavily sanctioning Russia. Realistically the maximum amount they can without declaring outright war. Some people might think that’s a good idea, but those people probably aren’t experts in geopolitics. Not that I’m an expert…

“But continually casting coverage of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine as racist isn’t a very convincing argument”