its stupid i agree but at least some places acknowledge its stupid. for instance where i live women can legally go topless if they want, just like men can go topless.

they can theoretically show whatever they want but they dont because theyd lose advertising. why do you think it took Comedy Central so long to air uncensored stuff (late at night)? and even then there is a lot of stuff they wont show.

what games in 3d Realms's backcatalogue do they actually own?

yeah Duke Nukem doesnt need to be like Serious Sam and we already have plenty of games that borrow Sam's gameplay.

or as i would have callously worded it: who should we be following on Twitter? no one.

i didnt say Lego owned the licenses. its just Lego has access to wide array of licenses and as a result lots of noteworthy characters. what characters does Minecraft have? and the Lego movie didnt just get licenses from Warner Brothers. but since it is a Warner Brothers movie it obviously has lots of major characters…

BUT it wasnt popular then (which was your argument). mobs were also added very early (though they couldnt attack you). Notch was building the basics of the game to test survival elements which were very much planned to be part of the game from day 1. i never claimed there wasnt a time when there wasnt survival. though…

actually no it wasnt. ive been following the game since the alpha (or pre-alpha or whatever it was called). it didnt have all the fancy mechanics you have now but there was still a survival aspect/mode long before it became popular. the creative mode was dominated by trolls and racists who would build giant swastikas…

well since it seems like Minecraft is the only one of his games anybody cares about, he is prepared to milk that sucker for every last dime. it reminds me a little bit of Rovio and all the Angry Birds stuff.

Minecraft isnt legos. there is no survival aspect to legos. they are just fun kids building toys with a huge line of licenses to draw content from which is why the movie worked.

i like Minecraft. in fact i have recently been playing it a lot lately after a long break. but... i think this is a pretty crap idea. some things just dont translate well to film.

oh magic sci-fi stuff. i was a bit confused since BeefBrocolli was talking about a real world Iron Man. we know the movie Iron Man can survive.

i may be in the minority here but i am fine with this. its not like the console games have been anything great for a while. on phones the bar is set pretty low. there is only one 3d skater on Android that i know of and its pretty crap compared to even the worst Tony Hawk games. all a Tony Hawk game needs to do is come…

your comment makes no sense to me. do explain. what kind of things compensate for g forces and impact forces?

they do if the company in question has a rocky history of going overbudget and repeatedly delaying their games. you have to remember its not a simple function. there are degrees. if a company goes a little overbudget once or twice, or as you mentioned their games sell so many it doesnt matter, publishers may be…

another thing which Talgrath didnt mention. developers that are often late and overbudget have trouble finding funding and/or publishing for their future games. in fact Double Fine has run into this problem before. its not just Double Fine either. many otherwise great developers have gone under from just that. so its…

i am so glad i am not alone in noticing this. i love his games so much, but i wish more people would call him on this. it doesnt make his games any worse admitting either.

youre forgetting sexual dimorphism which is another reason animals have feathers. while t-rexs and other large dinosaurs probably werent completely covered in feathers. there is still a good chance they had some.

lmao. you mean you werent pumped for Duke Nukem Generic Title when they flashed its name one the screen for the 10th time in a row?

i dont know. i liked Rom Check Fail which seemed to do a bit more with the glitch gameplay.