aa-zz
Aa-Zz
aa-zz

Trump is a dealmaker, but there’s no reason to believe that the American people are on the same side of the table as he is - he’s only interested in Trump (and his immediate family). The American people are in the position of the bondholders and contractors for his casinos - people who get screwed while he walks off

So, you aren’t at all concerned that he’s chosen as his Attorney General nominee a sworn opponent of voting rights? Or that he keeps blathering on about “voter fraud,” even though there’s (a) virtually zero evidence of it, and (b) it’s obvious to anyone who’s not completely in the thrall of Trump that when he and

He was a Constitutional Law professor, and had been a Senator. Also, he showed a willingness to learn and an understanding that he didn’t immediately know everything, so relying on subject matter experts would be a good idea. Trump shows no evidence that he has any humility, or any desire or capability of learning.

Is that a rhetorical question?

Then stop using epithets like “libs.” If you can’t ignore the political commentary, then please spare the rest of us your interminable ranting. You made your point. Clearly, some of us are unmoved. Stop being a total fuckwad about it. You are absolutely inviting these rebuttals.

Fuck you, you fucking fuck.

Nice! Just politicize a tragic event. You opportunist asshole, you’re really are a typical Liberal. FUCK YOU CUNT

Just answering your question as to why politics was brought into the mix.

FYI. She hated Trump.

calling out a single polititian isn’t “making it political”, but using phrases like “typical Liberal” certainly is. If Carrie taught us anything it’s that there isn’t a ‘Typical’ anybody.

I’m not calling for anyone to be impeached. I’m just pointing out that that’s a pretty flawed argument on its face. If a pilot was acting drunk before takeoff, and I knew about it, of course I would have problems with that. Given Trump’s rhetoric and behavior in the leadup to his presidency, I would say that, within

Now everything is clear - just because someone can get away with something means it’s no big deal. Definitely a Trump supporter here. Thanks for clearing that up.

If I had reason to believe the pilot of a plane that I was on may be drunk, yes, that is something I would take umbrage with. What kind of analogy is that?

But is that worthy of calling someone a cunt?

Sure, and here’s another point of view you’re not considering: Rolling back civil rights for no credible reason (other than simple bigotry) is non-negotiable. As in, it doesn’t matter who “technically” won a disputed election; If civil rights go, we’re going to war. By selling out the nation’s minorities (who will be

I mean, do you board a plane and scream at the pilot for potentially being drunk and wanting a new pilot before the plane even departs the gate?

If the pilot has announced that he is drunk, has never flown a plane before, and plans to go through the passengers’ luggage for their valuables while, if the mood strikes him, sexually assaulting the flight attendants, then yes.  

There’s nothing politically partisan about loathing a narcissist who has explicitly promised to roll back our — as in yours too — civil rights and destabilize the planet. My family of lifelong Republicans hates him as much as any of your so-called “typical liberals”, if not more.

It happens EVERYWHERE. Just because you’d “call them out” here doesn’t mean it’s not prevalent everywhere else. Again, typical conservative train of thought “if it isn’t happening right here in front of me, it’s not happening anywhere else” mentality. Do you troll other sites to find conservatives who bring up