If I am delusional, then you are a dumbass. Of all the hardline, religion-led nations out there, Iran is the one that has the highest chance to act reasonably; and their population is definitely the most reasonable one. Sure there are radicals everywhere, but Iran actually has everything to gain if they act…

So instead of rapprochement, you would press on with the counterproductive sanctions and warmongering. They are buying SSMs and ballistic missiles from China anyway, and they are not that stupid to attack US military without a very good reason, as they know what the response would be.

This is completely illogical. The only reason an international sanctions regime was able to stick to Iran in the first place was because the US was negotiating in good faith to limit the Iranian nuclear program. Once that was achieved, Iran only got back, at best, money it would have had anyway, and arguably, actually…

Better this than nukes, which they were going to get unless we made this deal or invaded.

So legitimate that he leveled AAA on his own people. Then bombed them. Then gassed them.

I mean, why aren’t we allowed to march into an air force base and sit in an F-22? Or at the president’s desk in the Oval Office? We paid for all that too.

Driving is a right: You can roll around any piece of land you own or you’ve been given permission to be on or OHV parks (typically operated by the Forest Service or the state/county) without any form of licensing, and very little restriction (typically adult supervision). You have no legal burden to register any…

“Because to the common criminal who don’t have the $$$, it’s harder for them to buy firearms from the black market in the UK or Japan.”

Really? So why are gun deaths so incredibly rare in, say, the UK or Japan? Or why the gun death rate has plummeted in Australia, a place culturally much like the US but which largely banned firearms recently?

If airbags saved lives in car crashes, we would be car crash fatality free too right?

“These are gun restrictions. Restrictions designed to impede law abiding citizens from buying guns.”

Obama said guns need to be banned for Americans

Outlawing certain kinds of firearms makes them incredibly expensive to obtain. For example: Australia has a weapons ban and the result is that the black market price for an M-16 type rifle is around $36k. This means petty criminals don’t get them because if you have that kind of money then why are you a petty criminal?

“If prosecution as recourse actually worked to prevent crime, then we should already be crime-free.”

Restrictions that you will easily be able to comply with if you don’t have a criminal record. Waiting periods, background checks, and in the future registries and insurance will not impede a law-abiding gun owner. It will be irritating and involve some nominal fees, but the diligent will easily be able to comply.

“HERP DERP, OBUMMER IS AFTER MY GUNZ”

And yet cars require registration, licensing, national databases, and renewal requirements. Are you mad about that? I mean, the gubment could be building a hitlist of everyone that drives a pickup. Are you scared, little man?

Show me proof that your gun rights have diminished in any…

Obama has never called for the banning of guns. Gun control amounts to hurdles to gun ownership that law-abiding and form-filling individuals will be able to overcome. The hurdles are there to trip criminals, and enable seizures and prosecutions of those who violate the hurdles. California is crawling with guns and…

What would she be vilified for? She got a joke question and gave a joking response. Carson gets serious questions and gives responses such as the pyramids being grain silos and evolution being a lie. World of difference.

What did Hillary ever do to you?