He definitely means Michigan.

Thanks for bringing politics into this for absolutely no reason.

Viagra is prescribed to treat ED with the endgoal of regaining your ability to become erect. If you don't plan to use your erection when having sex, the argument for treating your ED becomes fairly moot. If anything, anyone who prefers to have sex with a flaccid penis should probably avoid ED pills entirely.

Now you're just being pedantic.

Yep, and this thread is explicitly discussing the merit of comparing these things to Viagra, which does not address male sexual desire. What is your point?

No one is saying that, though?

As far as vasodilation goes, yes, Viagra would have that effect on women.

Viagra exists so that men who were previously incapable of having sex via ED are now capable of getting it up. Not having a tingly vagina doesn't mean that you're incapable of sex, just that you're probably less interested in having it.

Who in Texas is pirating Garry's Mod? It's like $2!

This. The female version of Viagra would probably be something that promotes self lubrication, although lubricants already exist exactly for this purpose.

You are correct on the first account: I feel that a DH who takes the field is no longer a DH, but a baseman/outfielder. Therefore my issue is indeed with the concept of the DH position, as it is designed as a role that doesn not contribute to defense at all.

Black's Beach is 1% attractive UCSD students, 4% older folks who just want to relax and let loose, and 95% creepy old men and/or marines who just want to see some tits. I've been there to surf and had old men ask me where all the "cute co-eds" were.

If you've lived anywhere with real seasons, living with San Diego's weather gets really tiresome really quickly. After going through a year or two of leafless autumns and bone dry "winters," I was pining to move anywhere that had snow, even if it meant not being able to surf year round.

Sure, pinch hitting/running is pretty silly as a dedicated position, but if that player is there as a backup and has to fill in when someone is injured or unable to perform, that's fine with me. But a professional pinch hitter is just as bad as the DH.

Actually, what I said was that the goalies can bring the puck out to the red line and/or make outlet passes during fast breaks, both of which heavily contribute to the team's offense.

The thread where I've already explained many times over that football players are capable of, and even expected to, situationally playing both sides of the ball, whereas a a DH never ever contributes to defense.

Read the thread next time.

So we can agree that baseball is the only sport that supports a role in which a player can completeley not contribute to an integral part of the game? Aside from the DH setup in the AL, every player must contribute both to the defense and offense of a team.

You should probably read the entire thread.

This is getting tiresome, so I'll make this simple.