Zi1toid
Zi1toid
Zi1toid

I told Doug he may need to go older on this one, maybe ‘50s or ‘60s. But what’s interesting enough to draw an audience for a whole year? This is my top suggestion at the moment:

Some kei car. We need to know what it’s like to live with a tiny car in the US.

It’s on set for filming, not his. Reading is fundamental.

That is a lot of mean things to say about the rider. How’s the bike, though?

My good friend just bought one of these. The 2016 525g. Apparently, it’s a more luxurious model, and comes with creature comforts such as a saddle brown (SensaTec, leather cost $1,450.) saddle. I asked if it had iDrive, but he said that that was part of a $2,500 Technology Package. Option packaging is terrible on

I clicked play and at first I seriously thought it was the ad before the video.

Whoa, no one cares. This is the designer responsible for the VehiCROSS and the Cube’s ripple headliner. I’m starting my essay now.

You know what? I think he actually was. From the minute this guy threw his hat into the ring I never thought he had the slightest interest in being president, he just wanted some attention to sell some books and get his name out there again. And I honestly think he never intended for it to go this far, and now he’s

Every time I look at that guy’s face I start laughing. I mean, every single time. I can’t help it. Unwilling Arabs in jetpacks ftw, lol...

If I worked that high up, I’d already have a parachute.

Gotta go with the classic kitty on this one. $9,500.00 and ready for weekend cruising.

Datsun 2000 Fairlady:

Not original engine. Needs to be jump started every time. E-brake doesn’t work. Some rust around rear.”

1979 Fiat Spider 2000

Gorgeous MR2 Turbo

I submit for your approval, a 1970 Saab Sonett Sonett III, in beautiful 60’s/70’s orange, running with less than 50k miles. Earlier resto job in 1995. Reserve not met yet at $3850, but I figure this car may well sell for less than $10k, as it’s a bit of a sleeper in the vintage market.

Fuck you and your ridiculous waste of an article. I saw no new or interesting information, and to preface this with "the REAL reason we never went back to the moon" and then essentially restate what's on official record is incredibly disingenuous. Fuck you and your clickbaiting pageviewing sorry excuse for what passes