So now we are switching all this 'republican' talk to 'the right' when that label grouping does not apply. people keep trying to lump something they don't understand into something they hate. Just because there are some child molesters in America, doesn't mean Americans are child molesters.

its an artistic satire of a political opinion. what did it mean to you?

I'm sorry this has been so difficult for you. If you need any help to see the error of your ways, I am here for you.

burrrrrr....burrrrrrr burrrrrrrrrrrr screech, varoom!
I don't see traffic jam, I see autocross track opportunity!

profitable. It means Profitable.

no, you were wrong there too. The picture has factual basis. You can easily find people who were against wars under bush but support them under Obama. in fact, Pelosi, Kerry, Ellison... Sorry dude, you lost this a long time ago.

I didn't vote for the guy, nor did I support him. there has always been distance. the republicans historically are crap with spending. absolute turds. they stink on ice. that is what I have been saying this entire time.
The democrats are just worse. That's why I welcome your link and appreciate the contribution. …

Which one.....

Yep. Thank you for supporting what I am saying and agreeing that Romney is no conservative.

I didn't say they are both equally bad. In fact I have often said the left is worse.

But that doesn't mean the republicans are without 'sin'.

One side is taking us to fiscal hell on a train, and the other side on a SR71 Blackbird. They are both headed in the same direction.

Boy oh Boy is that Democrat Jet shiny.

Oh, and…

First you say:
"Conservatives are so against wasting government money?"

Then you list a bunch of republican items...
Then you say:
"Tell me again how the Republicans"

Do you see how you just shot yourself in the foot there and blew away your own credability? You may as well have said:

"Daddy long legs are so not going to…

Okay, then 5 jobs that last 2 years.

I wish I would have thought of it. and Hey... I bet with 530 million, I could make 100 jobs that last 20 years.

that is a completely valid distinction to make from a very very very democrat/liberal pool (Gawker readers/posters).

Though, the readers are still voting in people like Pelosi, Kerry, Ellison, who support war only when their side does it.

Remember, republicans do the same thing, its just for some reason pointing out…

The new X3: Drives like a....

You know you've lost when you resort to name calling. Point, set, match. thank you for playing. Please hit me up when you read the definition of bipartisan and re-evaluate how your political leaders voted. I am here to help.

would you like to take a look at the national debt increase under President Obama and edit your statement? Yes, republicans spend crazy, democrats spend crazier. that's why i'm not talking about either of them when I say "conservatives would rather the government just not waste taxpayer money or something stupid…

You can't say Democrats are against war in Syria anymore then you can say "republicans are against the war in Syria". and the only thing either the republicans or democrats have remained consistent on is supporting garbage only when their side does it but calling it out when the other side does the same.

I am a child? I'm not the one saying "But but but support of 58% of democrats isn't enough to be bipartisan!!!" if you click on the word bipartisan you can look up what it means. I did that with all my links above because I assumed your next step would to belittle 58% of support in the senate and 39% support in the…

Yes, republicans burn through cash just as quickly as their democrat counterparts, but Dude, as you yourself quoted me, I said "conservatives are opposed to this because it's wasteful".

its funny how you think they are the same. you probably think all democrats are liberals too eh?