Why do you people keep watching this misogynistic televised prostitution?

That is literally why I buy U by Kotex. It's more expensive, and the packaging is a little tweeny, but goddamn if their commercials aren't excellent. One of the early ones was a woman standing outside a store with her dog asking men to buy her tampons. The men were...less than enthusiastic.

I'm grinning like a fucking idiot while spinning in circles near a cliff at sunset right now!

Don't get pissy because your opinion was stupid and it was treated as such. It's not our fault.

I do a lot of swimming in white bathing suits as well, don't know about you.

Also why periods are blue.

I highly enjoy women reacting to "Female Product Marketing" on twitter.

This explains all commercials because obviously when my period comes along I'm infinitely more chirpy and active while wearing white pants.

"I follow straightwhiteboystexting.tumblr.com"

I follow straightwhiteboystexting.tumblr.com/ and the submissions are horrifying. The disgusting pattern I've started noticing on the time-stamped texts is that a lot of the shitty fucking comments are texted before 9AM. Nine fucking AM. The only thing I want inside of me before noon is a cup of coffee. No one cares…

What segment? What are you talking about? Are you talking about the television show from which the author learned about the Cuchini? Are you talking about the product itself? Or are you talking about the article? What specifically do you think is damaging the women's movement?

opinions are fine. Being condescendingly bossy to women about how to be feminists is just being the butt of your own joke, which is also fine, but makes you look stupid.

oh, hang on - "you guys"? mansplaining about feminism, of course. The logical conclusion.

Maybe your Dad owns you again now (Damned Cuchini), but you totally owned that troll. The questions is, who wants it?

I agree. There's nothing deep or real about these people and anyone who is all "this is true love!" is deluded. He has a dolly called "Kim" and he dresses her up and trots her around. Kimye is a fucking Koons exhibit. And I have a feeling that his heart belongs to Riccardo Tisci.

Uhhh... You realize that the article is criticizing the product, right? The product implicitly shames women for the natural shapes of their bodies, and the article mocks that. So... how exactly is the article setting back the women's movement?

So you think exposing the outline of your labia is what women's rights is about?

No, I'm dead serious. What are the strides we've made since 1994 that are the issue here? How specifically is an internet article mocking a product that seeks to shame women for the natural way their body looks affecting our progress?

Out of curiosity, what amazing advances do you think we've made since 1994 that this is really rolling back?