Yardoz
Yardoz
Yardoz

I was speaking hypothetically, abortion isn't freely available or cheap either, but the man should be allowed to waive his parental rights and not have to pay anything. if she doesn't want to carry the fetus for nine months, she shouldn't be forced to, if he doesn't want it, he should not be forced to pay for it. The

You do know that the Nazis claimed that they were inspired by the US' eugenics program?

I think that abortion should be made cheap and freely available, if a woman wants a kid but the man doesn't, he should be allowed to waive his parental rights and not have anything to do with the child. If a woman doesn't want the child, she should be allowed to abort without anyone's permission.

Only in the US. Other countries don't have this weird system where a university is responsible for recruiting athletes. Sports as a hobby/extracurricular is still done, but the university isn't responsible for competitive sports.

I guess I'm not a big fan of athletic scholarships either, but I didn't grow up in the US and athletic scholarships are unheard of in almost all other countries, so I could be biased.

Yeah, I agree, I also think that decoupling the university system and competitive sports would have other benefits.

I know they exist, but I think it would be a better solution if the club teams replaced the collegiate athletics. There would still be 'hobby' clubs but there would also be competitive ones like the British soccer teams that replace university ones.

Subsidized memberships for high school students would cost a lot less money than having public universities have their own athletics department and would solve a lot of issues that the current system has.

I still think that the US system of lumping in athletics with educational facilities is dumb. Wouldn't the European system of having students join clubs completely unaffiliated with their schools, (high schools or college) be a lot better?

While we are in the business of telling other people what to eat, allow me to suggest that you try grilled chicken fajitas, they are really good with some sour cream and cheese.

No, I won't, because I don't find the animals adorable enough.

I'm not sure people would find this image any better:

Yeah... the hypocrisy of people here talking about how they think the guy is hot but complain about men not finding obese women attractive is comparable to that of unattractive guys complaining about fat women. Let's be honest here, how many of us would be turned on by this ad if it featured a conventionally

" I would never wear anything that could be offensive to any religion because i have respect for others."

Why is Jezebel so concerned with what Rajan Zed thinks? Because most Hindus sure don't give a shit.

I'm pretty sure that kids will learn the middle finger at some point of their lives and it's a lot more likely that they will learn it from tv or from their friends than that display.

That's kind of my point, the kids don't know what it is unless someone tells them not to do it, then they'll keep on doing it to get a rise out of you. And I agree that they have a tendency to repeat what they see on tv, however I don't see that display as anything close to a television program they might want to

Unless you specifically tell your kids that there's something wrong about the sign, they won't know. And have no reason to imitate it.

They won't mimick it if it doesn't get a response, and unless you make a big deal out of it, they won't keep trying to provoke you, i.e their parents by doing it.

I'm not sure why kids would be any more affected by it than adults, I mean, it's not like the kids are going to go "well the older woman next door had set up a display with a middle finger, therefore I'm going to start using it."