Right now, you turn the Wii U on and you wait. Then you navigate through a bunch of menus that, really, you shouldn't have to. A new system update due out this summer will make it so you can get to playing games a lot faster. Straight from Nintendo's top guy, with our emphasis:

Well, yes, yes they do get to do that, and they will. Things change in a blink of an eye sometimes. You may not be okay with that, but that doesn't negate the fact that people as well as the media have defined games like LoL as a moba. While I concede that "hundreds" is a an embellishment in retrospect, I would bet…

Doesn't make it less of a definition, now does it? Definitions get amended all the time. Again, the term was used correctly.

Yeah, no. You're still wrong. Mobas are a thing. Millions of people and hundreds of companies defining them that way say you're wrong. Deal with it.

haha, that was pretty good!

Pulling out the trusty dictionary (Merriam-Webster). It defines "factoid" as:

Nah, selling out stadiums is a big deal in the gaming world. No, it won't matter to the majority of gamers (and trust me, I get what you're saying). That doesn't make it not a big deal.

No, it's a moba. Get over the fact that it has changed and has been defined by pretty much everyone that plays these games.

Except that's not what it means at all...

Does that 70% include all the moms on Facebook playing Candy Crush? I mean, lets talk about demographics here. I'd be willing to bet that a big portion of millenials not only know about LoL, but do care quite strongly about it. Otherwise you wouldn't have Riott games selling out stadiums for their e-sport competitions.

I see your point, but again, there is nothing "additional" about their fee if it doesn't require PS+. Whether or not you or anyone else already pays for PS+ is completely your decision and is not mandatory to play TESO. You're basically arguing that Bethesda shouldn't have a monthly fee. Because whether Sony required…

This argument really strikes me as odd. So, they're telling you that you can play a game without need of a PS+ subscription, and your argument is that you already have it so it's not fair? You need to separate PS+ from this game's subscription fees because one is Bethesda and the other is Sony. Two different entities.…

I dabbled a tiny bit in AC3, and I decided that it wasn't my thing. I picked up ACIV for PS4 (seemed like the default choice at the time), and I was actually pretty excited about playing it from what I heard. After spending more than 100 hours in the game, I can say without a doubt that this is one of the most…

The original Yoshi's Island was called Super Mario World 2: Yoshi's Island. That's why.

I love console gaming and pc gaming, and even if it doesn't look the same, the PC version still looks pretty darn amazing. I'm satisfied with that. I'm not about to get jealous of swaying trees. And, well, if I was, I'd probably buy it on PS4. /shrug

A different team worked on the port for Xbox One and PS4. There was no rushing the PC/Xbox 360/PS3 versions. The PC version, in fact, still remains AMAZING looking despite the differences referenced in this article.

I'd take a simple patch to update the graphics on PC than getting a whole new version of the same game that included dlc I didn't want to buy anyway. I hope that Square does that. They probably won't, but I'm hopeful.

Nothing matches taco flavor Doritos for me; however, I am impressed with how many different bag designs Doritos goes through in Japan!

Ubisoft handled the PC port of RE4.

It's like I want to, but I can't take my eyes off this one .gif. Dlnopoulos you win the internet tonight.