Allow me to weigh in here. Not had a lot of experience or luck, but maybe something I can share. First of all, don't go in all guns blazing on finances - this is a recipe for disaster and falling into stereotypes (been there, got the wounds to prove it). If I had my time again I'd spend some months getting acquainted…

Ah, sure, just deny it. You quite blatantly wandered in on my discussions throwing around bile, vitriol and insults - I don't even fucking know who you are, I make a neutral post in neutral language and you go all fucking stupid. So yeah, you telling me you're not the troll makes as much sense as your viewpoint right…

Ah, you again - I've got your card now. This great country is built on the backs of men who were willing to fight and die to secure it. Tell me that's not true - I dare you. There are some men here with rifles that might disagree. Radical feminism, as I'm sure you know all too well, is built on the backs of men who…

You should get that checked - next thing you'll be thinking your whole family spells out Google. They might even mess with your Google Glass so that everything really does spell out Google.

I just got a $2 settlement from the whole Chase overdraft debacle that just made it through the courts - which is funny since the class action never really affected me at all. The paper is probably worth more than the settlement.

Otherwise we'd all be subscribing to that "Free Love" nonsense from decades ago.

Using a dictionary definition is required reading - you can't have a meaningful discussion unless every person in the room believes the same things about the language. It's not about critical thinking, it's just 101, and I'm hearing disconnects in the definitions.

Is everyone else getting a picture of this in their mind? It's quite a disturbing image.

Especially since the crop removes all possible context from the image as well. We could be talking about bad shoes or playing footsie for all we know.

Is it changing over time though? I wouldn't call it fixed at all. I don't know about you but I see a trend in promiscuity becoming more acceptable for females. Is that good, or is that bad? All I can change is my attitude toward it.

At a young age we all compete for sexual partners - the numbers are just there as an indicator of success in that regard. Other strange things happen - women are drawn to married men because a ring on the finger is an indicator of an acceptable mate. As you get older that competitive drive falls away. Maybe not…

I think she would be within her rights to refuse and this is just the understanding that goes along with it. Yes, you can suggest, and she can take that onboard and make a judgment call if the risks outweigh the benefits. Your position is likewise that her call is a final decision and you all learn to just live with…

You're probably-to-definitely right on that account and it's just that I've over-trivialized it. The more comments I hear back (even the childish, trolling ones *groan*) the more I'm seeing there's a missing link in here. I want to embellish on the "idea of sex" - that statement is particularly interesting since it's…

Short of your childish insults the antidepressant statement is quite a helpful analogy for this discussion - so thanks for that.

Well, I've been put in my place there. It's quite obvious you're female, but why is anyone sorry? I'm not making bones here. Sorry, my job requires me to be very precise so I sometimes come off a bit terse.

I think all these things are far too complex to reduce to a single bullet point. I can partly sympathize because I've been in relationships where there just isn't the whole fireworks display - you'd be amazed how far you can get with a sexless relationship though as long as all parties are in agreement. It might…

None of this explains the desire for certain pervs to go looking or taking photos. Really, if it was just "empty space" then there wouldn't be guys standing by with cameras. Same goes for "too much leg". I get how this can be complicated though since a definition that goes "anything which evokes a primal response from…

I think someone got confused here. Viagra has no effect on libido - it's meant to treat erectile dysfunction. It solves the physical barriers, not the mental barriers. This looks like a solution to the mental side of things.

I wouldn't worry. Most of the comments up there are coming from people with no brains. It's schoolyard mentality time and I'm more than a little depressed they didn't learn to form a cohesive argument in all those years on the planet. I wouldn't even call it ad hominem, I'd just call it outright moron shit-flinging.

What's Conan doing with his other hand??