The difference is, according to the latest studies KINDLY POSTED AT FREE GOVERNMENT WEBSITES LIKE NIH/PUBMED, that having over a certain volume of fat is counter productive, period. In that way, obesity is the flaw.

Not period, it is also wasteful as per body type for engineering most expensive and more resource intensive products which costs the taxpayers money. We are trying to afford healthcare, and OBESITY is now a greater problem than other habits. It isn't just in how someone looks. Do you even understand how fat cells…

You have time to post on Jezebel but no time to do strength training instead of cardio which doesn't work?

Do you even understand how fat cells work? Over time they make your body counter productive in terms of health. That is based on time and amount, which can be seen. "Hitting the gym" is laughable given that most people simply do cardio, which has been debunked for over thirty years. Do you even understand how much…

Fallacy. Pure fallacy. Cardio has been debunked for thirty plus years for health and weight loss.

Cardio is horrible exercise for fat loss and health in most cases. Do you even PubMed?

Cardio is horrible for fat loss in most cases. Why do people fall for the cardio myth?

Do you even understand how fat works? How it changes with a greater capacity? You really need to read pubmed and NIH more and understand that cardio is shit for the most part.

You are assuming that walking and running are good exercise alone. Please see how cardio is debunked as early as thirty years ago. Stop reading the "bro-science" blogs and start reading pubmed / NIH.

Walking and running is almost worthless. Do you even read NIH/Pudmed? Your bias is clear.

Yes, because air capacity , oxygen, and blood disorders are the same thing.

Not really. That is not the result over time. They will gain weight over time from calories in vs calories out. You cannot change the rate at which muscle burns calories per pound. You are speaking of a specific time period, not overall. That is fallacious.

Depending on your body type and height that may not be outside the norm. In places where people live longest in Japan and Italy they are very short. You are also assuming your habits did not cause your thyroid issues in the first place, which is fallacious.

Do you even understand how bulimia works in relation to muscle growth? Look at that bulk. You've got to be kidding yourself.

Prove it. Look at the areas of the world where people live longest. One correlation is restricted caloric intake in relation to calories burned, and exercise.

This is where you and I disagree. If you get government funding, you should be forced to allow free speech. The logic is similar to other demographics that are protected because of government funding, such as in Colleges. For example, a Telco cannot limit free speech. Your point is not well thought out.

If you spent any time around http://bodybuilding.com forums' nutritional section, you'd know that isn't true. There have even been postings for people on foodstamp budgets. There are also links to what qualifies and what is fast and easy to make. Alternatively you can consume powders when you have no time. This is…

Why? Using Jezebel's own logic, it won't bring your happiness in every area of your life ever. It won't make you rich and famous. It won't make you proud of your children. Why bother? Sarcasm.

Jezebel being fallacious and using a false equivalency as it suits them? Never. Sarcasm.

I'm talking about biologically, not within a civilization. Apples meet oranges. You are being fallacious right now. Other biological adaptations are joints on the elbows of women. Reduced chance of survival but more total survivors as per the norm of such adaptation. Also see: evolutionary traits such as inflection…