You are assuming that gamers are part of wider society, where they actually have antisocial tendencies higher than the norm. They are also exposed to greater instances per game of unrealistic body images. That is two in one. You have no yet given a justification for only applying one or having the message of one over…

Yes, i'm sure your BeautifulSoup and Django projects are swell. I'm stating that the logic is invalid based on proof concept. Programmers have some of the lowest unemployment rates of any profession, but not all CompSci majors get into programming specifically. There is a huge difference between using a shell and…

You are classifying a game that is played by more men and contains more male characters as following a trope of society as a whole. You take away from the dynamics of the game and user-base itself. Within the game and community, they are being met with more unrealistic body expectations in total. That is the problem.…

The rate of FICTIONAL and FAKE characters that are abnormal is higher for men because there are more male characters in games. This is a catch-22. The same games are sold in all countries regardless of patriarchal influences within said culture or country. This is an uneven distribution for your point. If this game is…

So does mowing the lawn, roofing, laying pipe in areas without heavy concrete foundations that extend beyond traditional piping, and other tasks that don't matter along with laundry for most people in 2013. These are jobs and tasks that are being automated.

You are making the same flaw though. The same demographics overlap for cooking and people that dry-clean the majority of their clothing. The largest job boom is in dry-cleaning and laundry facilities. They have public APIs if you would like to programmatically compare the data.

That would depend on what part of the world you live in. In areas where cooking is less common such as inner cities that may be true. In some areas and households it may be everyday. Generalizing is wrong regardless of who does it.

Thanks for the data to prove your point. Obviously it never, ever happens.

Stop being illogical instead of trying to qualify and quantify micro and macro scales to actually solve problems. Feelings are flawed.

Learn the difference between when a macro and a micro model matters for results. You cannot apply an entirety scale logic cluster to a single company's product. It does not work that way, logically. In that way you would only be benefiting the majority or minority outside of each system. There are more men in games…

They an also be shown not to be mathematically viable. Example: I can put code into any shell that does not work. You miss this because you obviously don't code.

If certain people are excluded from being progressive, then it is not progressive. Only by being inclusive do movements gain traction. See NAACP vs Niagra movement. This is about individualism. I never said they had limited opportunities. Ever. If she wants to be in the media, who are you to judge her? Is there…

Most fallacies are based on math. Symbolic and mathematical logic are known very well at this point. I'm sorry you went to a shit school or aren't a STEM major. Sometimes it is noted as the philosophy of math.

Do you even know who the character is based on? Filthy casual music fan. You also shouldn't have to justify any tye of person being used. That is just pathetic.

No, you said that you assumed that she was raped because of how people who were raped act. You are an idiot. Period. You went in so far over your head on this one it is pathetic. You called someone out for an ad hom and violated over 29 fallacies within your base logic. I keep a list of 304 next to my mousepad. You…

Many of us do know enough about the case, as we had to change our school of choice due to the impact it had on the program at Duke. Please take your fallacies and kindly shove them up your ass. The day this case dropped that woman was doxed, showing extreme signs of mental illness from previous events. Some of us…

The problem is you are glossing over the differences in scale between macro and micro levels. This actually has a counterproductive result on the goals you have for social justice. The other side of the debate does the same thing. That is the problem. You are allowing your generalized viewpoint to be applied at two…

SHE KILLED SOMEONE.

Your bias is showing. You obviously didn't follow the case. You say probably and yet her own coworker says otherwise, as well as DNA evidence. You are biased and illogical, period. You have no proof, but "feel" that something happened. Feelings are not logic nor empirical evidence. You have a dangerous line of…

It is also consistent with the behavior of a psychopath or someone with BPD.