Writer4003
Writer4003
Writer4003

If teachers and staff can’t find reasonable, non-violent ways of dealing with difficult students, they shouldn’t be working with children. It’s truly that simple. It’s pretty obvious to me that you’re trolling, but I don’t really care. You’re not edgy or funny. You’re just wrong.

But you can see why I might think that based on this statement, “Let’s start preventing sexual violence rather than punishing offenders after they’ve already harmed someone irrevocably.”

And children once they are born. No foodstamps, no education, no housing, no safe adoptions.

So are gay people virgins forever then? That’s ridiculous.

What are these phallic objects everyone is holding? They look like sex toys.

Why are you trying to hold me accountable for things you think the people who run this website believe?

We do have that for all crimes. If you’re convicted of a crime, it goes on your record. That record is available for anyone who does a background check on you. Most housing renters and employers will run a background check before they take someone on. So if you suspected someone of being a murderer, you could run a

You’re comparing apples to oranges. Yes, sexual assault is considered a violent crime, but it is not comparable to murder. They are different crimes with, often, very different motivations. So you bring up murder, but no one here is advocating keeping sex offenders in prison forever. I’m not sure why you’re making

I’m sorry, you’re advocating for...not punishing sex crimes? Why can’t we work toward preventing sexual violence and punish those who hurt someone irrevocably?

He’s not a minor. He’s 19.

How will we know when they are rehabilitated? How do you test that? Will we be 100% able to weed out those who are “truly rehabilitated” from those who are really good liars? Who will determine what rehabilitation means? Are there any proven effective methods to rehabilitate rapists yet?

Hate to be that commenter, but the first couple words, “anyone woman” are really confusing. Did you mean “any one woman” instead? There’s a slight difference between the words, although maybe it was just a typo.

The craft itself is secular. I never said all witches themselves were secular, only that witchcraft is not tied to any one belief system, religion, or spirituality, which is the definition of secular. I know you didn’t want to bring yourself into it, but you just proved my point. If you can be religious but practice

Coven had a rape scene in the first episode, too. Madison is gang raped after being drugged at a frat party. But I think it was framed differently. It was clearly a critique of frat guy misogyny and Madison’s immediate, violent, and emotional revenge was, I think, supposed to reflect the rage a victim of sexual

Yes, that’s what I’m talking about, too. Modern witchcraft is secular. Again, I’m not sure where you’re getting your information, but the community of witches I’m familiar with recognizes the craft as a secular practice that can be applied to any number of religions. Can you maybe provide some statistics that say

Right, but that doesn’t make witchcraft non-secular. It’s been practiced for a long time by people of many faiths, which would mean it would have to be unaffiliated with any one religion. Also, I think you may be confusing religious with spiritual. As an atheist, I’ve met other atheists who are spiritual, but not

Except witchcraft is a secular practice. Some witches worship gods and goddesses, some are part of the organized Wicca, but there are plenty of atheist witches.

That is fantastic! She’s so badass and the end is so cute!

Except guys did get pissed about Charlize Theron when she was in Mad Max. It didn’t matter if they thought she was attractive. She wasn’t conforming to what they beleive women in action movies should be. That wasn’t even a role that was rewritten for her - it was just a badass female role. They just got pissy because

I guarantee there’ll be at least a little faction that had their heart set on Brad Pitt as the lead. Or, more likely, they’ll pull the “but this character was originally written as (male/white/heterosexual/able bodied/etc)! They shouldn’t change things just to satisfy stupid special interest groups!” thing again.